Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. CROMELIN. Mr. Chairman, we hope to file briefs in addition to the
oral statements.
Mr. CURRIER. As far as the House committee is concerned there is no
expectation that there will be a report of this bill at this session
of the Congress.
Mr. CROMELIN. Will the gentleman be good enough to state that
positively on behalf of the committee, so that the interests that
ought to be represented here to-day, and whose representatives must
remain away, can be satisfied on that point?
Mr. CURRIER. I can state it most positively, as far as the House is
concerned.
Mr. CROMELIN. I thank you very much.
The CHAIRMAN. And the same is true so far as the Senate is concerned.
Mr. CROMELIN. I thank you very much. We have endeavored to get that
information from the Librarian, and he stated yesterday that it was
highly improbable, but he could not state----
Mr. PUTNAM. Mr. Cromelin, if you will excuse me, I said that I had no
right to give any such prophecy on the part of the committee; it was
not within my control. You will do me the justice to say, Mr.
Cromelin, that I added that when the copyright office asked for this
bill to be introduced it had no expectation itself of any possibility
of its being reported at this session.
Mr. CROMELIN. Thank you very much for the information I have gotten
from the Librarian and from the chairmen of the respective committees.
That assures us on the point, for the first time, that this bill will
not be reported at this session of Congress.
(After a consultation between the members of the committees:)
The CHAIRMAN. The committee has decided that it will hear some
representative of all these interests, if they shall so desire, not
exceeding an hour, with the same permission to supply in writing such
matter as they may desire, as was given to Mr. Walker. I might add
that it seems to us that the representatives of these interests can
state concisely in that time their objections to the bill as
introduced in the Senate and House, leaving the details to be supplied
in writing, as I have suggested. It does not seem necessary to us,
unless it is desired by these representatives, to have each gentleman
representing each manufactory make a speech to this committee. We
think that it will be giving you all a fair opportunity to be heard to
comply with the suggestion that has been made.
Mr. WEBB. The interests are about the same.
The CHAIRMAN. The interests are precisely the same, as I understand
it, so that the objections must be along the same line.
Mr. CROMELIN. Mr. Chairman, may I merely state that as regards sound
records as understood by a phonograph record, a graphophone record, or
a telegraphonic record, the interests may not be the same. We are
standing together against the whole measure; but it must be fully
understood that in so far as relates to the reproduction of sounds
previously produced, there may be a distinction between a
sound-producing machine and a sound-reproducing machine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account