Aristocracy & Evolution: A Study of the Rights, the Origin, and the Social Functions of the Wealthier ClassesMallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Science
Aristocracy & Evolution: A Study of the Rights, the Origin, and the Social Functions of the Wealthier Classes
Mallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Ability; Aristocracy (Social class); Social sciences
The true causes, says Mr. Spencer, of all social phenomena are
physical environment and men’s natural character • 29
The first physical cause of progress was an exceptionally fertile
soil • 29
and an exceptionally bracing climate • 29
All the conquering races came from fertile and bracing regions • 30
There were other regions more fertile, but these were enervating; and
hence the inhabitants of the former enslaved the weaker inhabitants
of the latter • 30
Again, division of labour, on which industrial progress depends, was
caused by difference in the products of different localities, • 31
which led to the localisation of industries • 32
The localisation of industries in its turn led to road-making; • 33
and roads made possible the centralisation of authority and
interchange of ideas • 33
Next, as to men’s natural character, which is the other cause of
progress, • 33
their primitive character did not fit them to progress, • 34
till it was gradually improved by the evolution of marriage and the
family—especially of monogamy • 34
Monogamy represents the survival of the fittest kind of sexual union
• 35
It developed the affections and the practice of efficient
co-operation • 35
The family being established, the nation gradually rose from it • 36
One family increased, and gave rise to many families, which were
obliged, in order to get food, to separate into different groups; • 36
and the recompounding of these groups, for purposes of defence or
aggression, formed the nation; • 37
all government being in its origin military • 37
But as the arts of life progress, industry emancipates itself from
governmental control, and becomes its own master, and also forms the
basis of political democracy • 37
Now, if we consider all these conclusions of Mr. Spencer’s, • 39
we shall find them to be all conclusions about aggregates as wholes,
not about parts of aggregates • 39
The only differences recognised by him between men are differences
between one homogeneous aggregate and another, • 40
and differences between similar men who happen to be occupied
differently • 41
But, as has already been said, the social problems of to-day arise
out of a conflict between different parts of the same aggregate;
therefore the phenomena of the aggregate as a whole do not help us
• 42
The conflict between the parts of the aggregate arises from
inequalities of position • 43
of which Mr. Spencer’s sociology takes no account • 44
Social problems arise out of the desire of those whose positions are
inferior to have their positions changed; • 45
and the practical question is, is the change they desire possible?
• 45
To answer this question we must examine into the causes why such and
such individuals are in inferior, and others in superior positions
• 46
Are inequalities in position due to alterable and accidental
circumstances? • 47
Or are they due to congenital inequalities which no one can ever do
away with? • 47
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account