Arius the Libyan: A Romance of the Primitive ChurchKouns, Nathan C. (Nathan Chapman)
Religion
Arius the Libyan: A Romance of the Primitive Church
Kouns, Nathan C. (Nathan Chapman)
Arius, -approximately 336 -- Fiction
"HIS MOST CATHOLIC MAJESTY."
The historians, secular and ecclesiastic, have alike failed to do
justice to the vast abilities of Constantine the Great. Those who have
questioned his superiority to all other Roman emperors (if, indeed, not
to all other men) have united in ascribing to accident, to the mere
drifting of events, facts which were really the forecastings of
profoundest statesmanship, guided by a political sagacity that pierced
through to the very core of the whole social and religious life of the
vast empire over which he ruled, almost untroubled by the influences of
human passions, fears, and faith. On the other hand, those who have
felt constrained to give even the slightest credence to his alleged
profession of faith in Christ have attributed to religious zeal,
enthusiasm, or fears, the most salient actions of a life that was, from
beginning to end, dominated only by the lust for dominion, incapable of
any creed but atheism, and absolutely content with the negation of the
existence of any Being greater than himself. To those who take a more
rational view of his magnificent but criminal career, and who, looking
behind the mask of reverence for paganism which he cast aside at
precisely the politic moment, in order to assume a false pretense of
reverence for Christianity, discern the cool, deliberate atheist, who
was ready to profess any creed and foster any superstition that might
best serve to smooth the road to absolute power, and make mankind his
slaves: to them the astute politician, the successful warrior, the
consummate ruler of men, assumes such colossal proportions that,
compared with him, Alexander, Cæsar, and Napoleon, seem to sink into the
lower grade of butchers and stabbers, only half-taught in the science of
government, of which Constantine alone was master. For it is no more
certain that he despised and pitied paganism while he was solemnly
offering sacrifices to Jupiter, and winning the admiration and love of
the Roman world for his imperial piety, than it is certain that he
pitied and despised the Church of Christ, even while he was manipulating
the faith into a sure and reliable support of the empire; in both
courses he only played with the world, giving men any religious toy
which the greater part might prefer to have, in exchange for the liberty
of which he robbed them so plausibly and successfully that they scarcely
perceived his theft, and enthusiastically caressed the royal thief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account