Armor and Arms: An elementary handbook and guide to the collection in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. — John Shaqi
Armor and Arms: An elementary handbook and guide to the collection in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.Hoopes, Thomas T.
History
Armor and Arms: An elementary handbook and guide to the collection in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Hoopes, Thomas T.
Armor -- Catalogs; Weapons -- Catalogs
A fine Italian wheellock pistol (Fig. 48) was formerly in the collection
of H. G. Keasbey. The barrel, ornamented with raised ridges giving it an
octagonal appearance, is inscribed “Lazari Cominaz”, an abbreviation of
the name of Lazarino Cominazzo, an early gunsmith of Brescia, in
northern Italy, whose work became so famous that the name was adopted by
his successors practically as a trademark. The simple but finely carved
lock and the lace-like openwork steel inlays of the stock are
characteristic of the best Brescian workmanship. The piece dates from
about 1630.
But the finest wheellocks in the collection are a “suite” consisting of
a gun and pair of pistols (Fig. 46 [4], [4A], [4B]). These three pieces
differ slightly from one another in their decoration, but they all bear
the same signature, “Claude Thomas à Espinal 1623”, and are otherwise so
similar that there is no doubt that they were intended to go together.
All have wheellocks elaborately ornamented with carving and engraving.
The pear wood stocks are magnificently carved in the round, in openwork,
and in relief, with plants, animals, and formal ornaments. They all bear
a coat of arms which has not yet been identified. On the pistols this is
on the side of the stock opposite the lock plate, but on the gun the
coat of arms is relegated to the left rear part of the stock, while the
region opposite the lock plate is ornamented with a medallion containing
the initials “C. T.”. This, together with the extraordinary elaboration
of all three pieces, suggests that this set of guns and pistols was not,
as was usually the case, made to the order of a wealthy client, but was
rather a “masterpiece” produced by a young gunmaker exhibiting all the
skill of which he was capable to prove his worthiness to attain the
title of “master gunsmith” in the gunmakers’ guild and the right to set
up a shop of his own. The coat of arms is presumably that of the noble
patron who had supported him in the past and to whom the pieces would
eventually come, but as they were made for glory and not for pay, the
gunsmith felt quite entitled to place his own initials in a prominent
position. It should be noted that though the pistols are both
smooth-bored the gun is carefully rifled. It is interesting to speculate
about the fate of Claude Thomas. It seems improbable that so skilled a
craftsman should not have been successful in his career. Yet, this set
of three pieces is the only work of this master known up to the present
time. Perhaps he tried experimenting in mechanisms as he had already in
decoration, with the result that a magnificent technician was destroyed
in the explosion of his invention. Perhaps he succumbed to the plague or
to the fortunes of war. All we know is that he could and did make some
of the most magnificent guns in the world, and here they are!
[Illustration: _Fig. 46. A group of masterpieces of the gunsmith’s
art, XVI-XVIII centuries._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account