Aromatics and the Soul: A Study of SmellsMcKenzie, Dan
Science
Aromatics and the Soul: A Study of Smells
McKenzie, Dan
Smell
“‘Good heavens, Jane!’—the words sounded so commonplace that every
trace of the unearthly was dissipated at the first syllable.—‘Good
heavens, Jane! Go and change that frock!—How often have I told you
what a fright you look in mauve.—A mill-girl on a holiday!—Come! Get
along and change it!’
“It seems silly, I daresay, and all that, but, do you know, no
sooner did I hear him growling and grumbling and finding fault with
colours he had a dozen times at least admired and praised than—I
couldn’t help it!—I forgot everything—everything. And all I could
say was:
“‘James! You’ve been eating onions again!’
“‘Not my fault, I assure you, my dear,’ he snapped back; ‘that
damned cook always will put garlic in the nectar! You must get rid
of her.’
“... I suppose I must have fainted then, for I remember no more till
I found myself lying on the floor with my head on the fender. I
picked myself up very puzzled as to what had happened. Then I
remembered my ... dream, with a shock rather of amusement than fear,
when suddenly—suddenly I smelled the nauseating stench of strong
garlic! That finished me entirely. How I got out of the place I
cannot tell. Out I did get. And I have never gone back.”
This lady evidently would not have subscribed to the old teaching of
Salerno:
“Six things that heere in order shall issue
Against all poisons have a secret poure.
Peares, Garlick, reddish-roots, Nuts, Rape and Rew,
But Garlick cheese, for they that it devoure
May walk in ways infected every houre;
Sith Garlick then hath poure to save from death
Bear with it though it make unsavoury breath:
And scorne not Garlick, like to some that think
It only makes men wink, and drinke, and stink.”
(It may be remembered, by the way, that Wilkie Collins’s “Haunted Hotel”
was haunted by a smell.)
Although we may agree with Shelley that
“Odours when sweet violets sicken
Live within the sense they quicken,”
yet we must admit that the memory of an odour cannot be reproduced in
our mind with the same clearness as a vanished scene or an old tune.
It may be found on trial that by concentrating the attention strongly
upon some familiar smell, particularly if at the same time we stimulate
the memory by picturing in our mind’s eye a scene in which that odour
figured as a feature in the sensory landscape, we are sometimes able to
recall its actual sensation. But the recollection lacks the intimate
reality of visual and auditory images. Without doubt the mind’s eye and
mind’s ear, when consciously aroused, are consistently more acute and
their representations are more vivid than those of the mind’s olfactory
organ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account