Anatomy, Artistic; Animals in art; Zoological illustration
[53] A proportion relative to the same region, and which at the outset
might appear similar, is pointed out by Bourgelat (see p. 266,
paragraph 4). But there exists a difference, for Bourgelat
compared the length of the head, measured from the forelock to
the commissure of the lips, and not that of the entire head, to
the distance which separates the summit of the rump and the tip
of the patella.
=Two and a half times the length of the head= gives:
1. The height of the withers, H, above the ground.[54]
[54] This proportion is that given by Bourgelat (see p. 265, paragraph
2).
2. The height of the summit of the crupper above the ground.[55]
[55] Consequently the withers and the crupper, being the same height,
are situated on the same horizontal plane. Bourgelat, on the
contrary, points out a difference of level in connection with
these regions. According to him the summit of the crupper is
situated below the horizontal plane passing the withers, and this
distance equals half of the space which separates the great angle
of one eye from that of the other (see p. 269, paragraph 20).
3. Very often the length of the body, from the point of the arm to that
of the buttock, although for a long time the type of Bourgelat had been
set aside as a conventional model, short and massive.[56]
[56] See p. 265, paragraph 2.
And M. Duhousset adds to this:
'The drawing that we offer, which has two heads and a half in height and
length, is that of a horse which we frequently meet with' (see Fig. 107;
see also p. 279, where we again consider this question of the length of
the body of the horse).
'The crupper, from the point of the haunch to that of the buttock, D, F,
is always less than that of the head. This difference varies from 5 to
10 centimetres. The width of the crupper, from one haunch to the other,
often very slightly exceeds its length.' MM. Goubeaux and Barrier add
that frequently it equals it.[57]
[57] If we refer to the proportions indicated by Bourgelat, we shall
find that the proportions relative to the crupper are also
indicated there (see p. 266, paragraph 4).
'The crupper, such as we have just defined it, D, H, may also be found
to a fair degree of exactness, as regards length, four times on the same
horse.'
1. From the point of the buttock to the inferior part of the stifle, F,
P.
2. The width of the neck, a little in front of the withers to a little
above the point of the arm, S, X.[58]
[58] MM. Goubeaux and Barrier replace this by the following: 'The
width of neck at its inferior attachment from its insertion into
the chest to the origin of the withers, S, X.' Bourgelat
discovered the same proportion (see p. 266, last line of
paragraph 4).
3. From this latter point to below the lower jaw, X, Q, when the head is
naturally placed parallel to the shoulders, E, H.[59]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account