ASCE 1193: The Water-Works and Sewerage of Monterrey, N. L., Mexico: The 4th article from the June, 1911, Volume LXXII, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Paper No. 1193, Feb. 1, 1911.Conway, G. R. G. (George Robert Graham)
Science
ASCE 1193: The Water-Works and Sewerage of Monterrey, N. L., Mexico: The 4th article from the June, 1911, Volume LXXII, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Paper No. 1193, Feb. 1, 1911.
"To secure a flow in this pipe having an average depth of 4
inches would require the sewage from a population of 6,500. In
general it may be said that the ordinary depth of flow in any
sewer should not be less than 2 inches, nor should it be less
than 1/2 the radius of the invert, since if it is so there is
much more danger of deposits forming along the edges and even in
the center of the stream. It will sometimes be impossible to
meet this requirement fully, but it should be kept in mind as
extremely desirable."
Sewers of small size should be proportioned throughout the system so that
the depth of the minimum daily flow in the invert, and the velocity of
flow, will be the best possible to prevent deposits. The transporting
power of water is dependent mainly on the depth of flow, a minimum
velocity being selected rather than a minimum depth of flow. To those who
have had charge of the maintenance of sewers, as well as of their design
and construction, this principle seems so obvious that it is always a
surprise to see it disregarded by designers, who in these days seem
inclined to consider sewerage as a system of grades and sizes of pipes
installed for ideal, rather than for actual, conditions. Messrs. Staley
and Pierson have well stated the principle involved as follows:
"A stream having a depth of flow sufficient to immerse solid matter held
in suspension, to a certain extent lifts it and carries it forward. The
entire surface is also exposed to the action of the current. A stream
having an equal velocity but a less depth in proportion to the diameter of
the solid matters to be transported, evidently has less transporting
power. * * * An amount of sewage which can be properly transported by a
circular sewer of a given size, cannot be as efficiently transported by
one of larger diameter."
From some strange idea, which is apparently without foundation in logic or
based on any actual justification from experience, it has of late years
become the practice of designing engineers to make the 8-in. circular
pipe the smallest size for sewers; and it is not improbable that the
designer of the Monterrey system has merely followed this example. It has
also become the frequent practice of designers to give every length of
sewer all the grade possible, regardless of the fact, taught both by
hydraulics and experience, that the best grade is that which will give as
much depth of flow as is consistent with a scouring velocity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account