Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn IndependentFord, Henry
General
Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
It is worth noting at this point that numerous opportunities were given
Franks to retire, both before and after the Arnold treason, but he
developed into a persistent clamorer after official jobs. In spite of
his testimony, he could not be shaken loose from public employment.
And then Franks revealed the whole secret of his relations with Arnold.
They were in close association in profiteering matters. “I had several
conversations on the subject with general Arnold ... he was to
participate in the profits of the business I was to enter into.” Arnold
was to remain a general in the army; his aide was to get out of the army
and work with him privately, sharing the profits.
But what had all this to do with the orders to close the stores at
Philadelphia? What had this to do with the papers found by Colonel
Fitzgerald? For after all, this was the “circumstance” which Major
Franks had set out to explain. At last he reaches it: “At that time,
previous to our going into Philadelphia, I had several particular
conversations with him ... I received at that time, or about that time,
the paper mentioned in Colonel Fitzgerald’s deposition which was not
signed, as well as the other.”
The paper authorized him to get the most merchantable goods out of the
closed stores. It followed upon “several particular conversations” about
the business of which Arnold was to “participate in the profits.” But,
apparently, the deal did not go through. Colonel Fitzgerald’s untimely
appearance, and the carelessness of some one in leaving the papers
about, were most unfavorable to the Arnold-Franks project.
There can be no question of the intimacy of the relations between the
Jew and Arnold and the use that both made of their relationship. There
can be no question, either, that these relationships must have been the
result of continuous acquaintance and testing.
Merely to show that a Jew once crossed the path of Benedict Arnold and
was implicated with him in a discreditable scheme that probably did not
fully mature, means nothing. But that this Jew was involved in Arnold’s
fortunes from the time the two first met in Canada until the day that
Arnold betrayed his country, may mean something. And that is the case.
From the time of their first meeting, their lines run along
together—Franks always being relied upon by Arnold as the credible
witness who extricates him from his scrapes, and Franks usually doing it
with a sort of clumsy success, as in the instance just cited.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account