Aspects of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Aspects of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
English essays -- 20th century; Science
only partial; the mythical boundaries are set a little further off, but
it is agreed that the high walls exist.
It is interesting to review the progress of Science from this point of
view, to see it as a gradual secession from unwarrantable assumptions.
The exceedingly cautious, the almost groping character, of the
advance of knowledge, becomes very apparent. And, although such a
survey may lead us to become very conscious of this particular mental
limitation, we are not one whit nearer being enfranchised. It is still
the prerogative of genius to be innocent, to turn surprised eyes on
one of our most arbitrary assumptions, and to say: But that is not
necessary. The history of Astronomy, of course, provides some of the
best examples of mental prison yards. That the planets must move in
circles because the circle is the perfect figure is an assumption now
sufficiently remote from our acquired sense of probability to seem
exceedingly strange. That it was an assumption possessing a high degree
of obviousness is apparent from the fact that even Copernicus did not
question it. The attempt to enter into this assumption, to see it as
obviously reasonable, would be a useful exercise for the historian,
since it involves, very largely, a reconstitution of the mental life
of that age. It acquired its obvious character from the fact that it
_fitted in_; it was the natural companion of a great number of
other equally obvious assumptions; it was not an isolated eccentricity
of the mind. It is for that reason that Copernicus never freed himself
from it, and that Kepler only succeeded after a difficult struggle.
Kepler was required to question not merely an isolated doctrine, but to
escape from a veritable _Zeitgeist_. The Inquisitorial examination
of Galileo, also, was not directed merely to correcting the erroneous
statement of an isolated fact; it was, in truth, a whole system of
thought that stood on trial. It is this double aspect of any given
abandoned assumption that accounts for our unimaginative surprise on
learning that very intelligent men once mistook it for an obvious
truth. We are judging the assumption, not on its own merits, as it
were, but from the standpoint of an alien system of thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account