Aspects of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Aspects of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
English essays -- 20th century; Science
If we contrast ancient with modern scientific theories we find
that the chief distinguishing characteristic of the former is that
they employ principles drawn from other branches of knowledge or
speculation. It would be, perhaps, rash to say that modern science,
in all its branches, is yet completely autonomous; sometimes, for
instance, it seems to make assumptions which are the result of an
uncritical philosophy, but even the grossest of these examples,
compared with many celebrated early scientific theories, shows how
great is the purification that has been effected. The chief error of
the old speculators consisted in imagining that the world is a more
obvious unity than we have now any reason to suppose. Hence they were
always willing to argue by “analogy,” comparing terms between which
we cannot now find the slightest resemblance. The method was not only
illegitimate, but sometimes led to quite unnecessary complexities of
explanation. The Ptolemaic system of astronomy, for instance, conceived
as the theory that the heavenly bodies revolve round the earth, was
a perfectly reasonable and satisfactory theory. It was capable of
explaining all the observed planetary motions, except a few minute
irregularities requiring precise measurements for their detection. Its
proper development required, of course, complete docility in face of
the facts. But in its actual development it was forced to accommodate
itself to quite other considerations. It had to take into account the
venerable principle that, the celestial bodies being obviously sublime,
incorrupt and perfect, their orbits must be perfect and described with
uniform velocities. The only possible perfect orbit was as obviously
a circle. Hence the Ptolemaic theory was loaded with the task of
explaining the observed heavenly motions on two grounds: first, that
the earth was stationary and at the centre of the system, and second,
that the planetary orbits were circular and described with unvarying
velocities. Alternative hypotheses were not only stupid but impious.
The task thus set to the early astronomers was one of considerable
difficulty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account