Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy: Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. SurrattHarris, T. M. (Thomas Mealey)
History
Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy: Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. Surratt
Harris, T. M. (Thomas Mealey)
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 -- Assassination; Surratt, John H. (John Harrison), 1844-1916
of nature and of war, and as such amenable to the military. Our
Constitution has made those laws a part of the law of the land.
Obedience to the Constitution and the law, then, requires that
the military should do their whole duty; they must not only
meet and fight the enemies of the country in open battle, but
they must kill or take the secret enemies of the country and
try and execute them according to the laws of war.
The civil tribunals of the country cannot rightfully interfere
with the military in the performance of their high, arduous,
and perilous but lawful duties. That Booth and his associates
were secret active public enemies no mind that contemplates
the facts can doubt. The exclamation used by him when he
escaped from the box onto the stage, after he fired the fatal
shot, _sic semper tyrannis_, and his dying message, "Say to my
mother that I died for my country," show that he was not an
assassin from private malice, but that he acted as a public
foe. Such a deed is expressly laid down in Vattel, in his work
on the law of nations, as an offense against the laws of war
and a great crime: "I give then the name of assassination to
a treacherous murder, whether the perpetrators of the deed be
the subjects of the party whom we cause to be assassinated
or of our own sovereign, or that it be executed by any other
emissary introducing himself as a suppliant, a refugee, or a
deserter, or in fine as a stranger" (Vattel, 339.) Neither the
civil nor the military department of the government should
regard itself as wiser and better than the Constitution and
the laws that exist under or are made in pursuance thereof.
Each department should, in peace and in war, confining itself
to its own proper sphere of action, diligently and fearlessly
perform its legitimate functions, and in the mode prescribed by
the Constitution and the law. Such obedience to and observance
of law will maintain peace when it exists, and will soonest
relieve the country from the abnormal state of war.
My conclusion, therefore, is, that if the persons who are
charged with the assassination of the President committed the
deed as public enemies, as I believe they did, and whether
they did or not is a question to be decided by the tribunal
before which they are tried, they not only can, but ought to be
tried before a military tribunal. If the persons charged have
offended against the laws of war, it would be especially wrong
for the military to hand them over to the civil courts, as it
would be wrong in a civil court to convict a man of murder who
had in time of war killed another in battle.
JAMES SPEED,
_Attorney General_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account