Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural TheologyWhewell, William
Religion
Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology
Whewell, William
Astronomy; Cosmic physics; Natural theology
It appears then that the highest point to which this series of
conjectures can conduct us, is, “an extremely diffused nebulosity,”
attended, we may suppose, by a far higher degree of heat, than that
which, at a later period of the hypothetical process, keeps all the
materials of our earth and planets in a state of vapour. Now is it
not impossible to avoid asking, whence was this light, this heat,
this diffusion? How came the laws which such a state implies, to be
already in existence? Whether light and heat produce their effects
by means of fluid vehicles or otherwise, they have complex and
varied laws which indicate the existence of some subtle machinery
for their action. When and how was this machinery constructed?
Whence too that enormous expansive power which the nebulous matter
is supposed to possess? And if, as would seem to be supposed in
this doctrine, all the material ingredients of the earth existed
in this diffuse nebulosity, either in the state of vapour, or in
some state of still greater expansion, whence were they and their
properties? how came there to be of each simple substance which
now enters into the composition of the universe, just so much and
no more? Do we not, far more than ever, require an origin of this
origin? an explanation of this explanation? Whatever may be the
merits of the opinion as a physical hypothesis, with which we do
not here meddle, can it for a moment prevent our looking beyond
the hypothesis, to a First Cause, an Intelligent Author, an origin
proceeding from free volition, not from material necessity?
But again: let us ascend to the highest point of the hypothetical
progression: let us suppose the nebulosity diffused throughout
all space, so that its course of running into patches is not yet
begun. How are we to suppose it distributed? Is it equably diffused
in every part? clearly not; for if it were, what should cause it
to gather into masses, so various in size, form and arrangement?
The separation of the nebulous matter into distinct nebulæ implies
necessarily some original inequality of distribution; some
determining circumstances in its primitive condition. Whence were
these circumstances? this inequality? we are still compelled to
seek some ulterior agency and power.
Why must the primeval condition be one of change at all? Why should
not the nebulous matter be equably diffused throughout space, and
continue for ever in its state of equable diffusion, as it must
do, from the absence of all cause to determine the time and manner
of its separation? why should this nebulous matter grow cooler and
cooler? why should it not retain for ever the same degree of heat,
whatever heat be? If heat be a fluid, if to cool be to part with
this fluid, as many philosophers suppose, what becomes of the fluid
heat of the nebulous matter, as the matter cools down? Into what
unoccupied region does it find its way?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account