Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematicsFerguson, James
Science
Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematics
Ferguson, James
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
+--------+---------+----+----+----+
| 50000 | 1476529 | 14 | 25 | |
| 60000 | 1771835 | 12 | 30 | |
| 70000 | 2067141 | 10 | 35 | |
| 80000 | 2362447 | 8 | 40 | |
| 90000 | 2657753 | 6 | 45 | |
| 100000 | 2953059 | 4 | 50 | |
+--------+---------+----+----+----+
| By comparing this Table with |
| the Table on page 113, it is |
| easy to find how many Lunations |
| are contained in any given |
| number of Sidereal, Julian, and |
| Solar years, from 1 to 8000. |
+---------------------------------+
CHAP. XX.
_Of the fixed Stars._
[Sidenote: Why the fixed Stars appear bigger when viewed by the bare eye
than when seen through a telescope.]
391. The Stars are said to be fixed, because they have been generally
observed to keep at the same distance from each other: their apparent
diurnal revolutions being caused solely by the Earth’s turning on its
Axis. They appear of a sensible magnitude to the bare eye, because the
retina is affected not only by the rays of light which are emitted
directly from them, but by many thousands more, which falling upon our
eye-lids, and upon the aerial particles about us, are reflected into our
eyes so strongly as to excite vibrations not only in those points of the
retina where the real images of the Stars are formed, but also in other
points at some distance round about. This makes us imagine the Stars to
be much bigger than they would appear, if we saw them only by the few
rays which come directly from them, so as to enter our eyes without
being intermixed with others. Any one may be sensible of this, by
looking at a Star of the first Magnitude through a long narrow tube;
which, though it takes in as much of the sky as would hold a thousand
such Stars, yet scarce renders that one visible.
[Sidenote: A proof that they shine by their own light.]
The more a telescope magnifies, the less is the aperture through which
the Star is seen; and consequently the fewer rays it admits into the
eye. Now since the Stars appear less in a telescope which magnifies 200
times than they do to the bare eye, insomuch that they seem to be only
indivisible points, it proves at once both that the Stars are at immense
distances from us, and that they shine by their own proper light. If
they shone by borrowed light they would be as invisible without
telescopes as the Satellites of Jupiter are: for these Satellites appear
bigger when viewed with a good telescope than the largest fixed Stars
do.
[Sidenote: Their number much less than is generally imagined.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account