Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematicsFerguson, James
Science
Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematics
Ferguson, James
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
If any other machine, such as a combination of wheels and screws, was
proposed to move the Earth, the time it would require, and the space
gone through by the hand that turned the machine, would be the same as
before. Hence we may learn, that however boundless our Imagination and
Theory may be, the actual operations of man are confined within narrow
bounds; and more suited to our real wants than to our desires.
[Sidenote: Hard to determine what Gravity is.]
160. The Sun and Planets mutually attract each other: the power by which
they do so we call _Gravity_. But whether this power be mechanical or
no, is very much disputed. We are certain that the Planets disturb one
another’s motions by it, and that it decreases according to the squares
of the distances of the Sun and Planets; as light, which is known to be
material, likewise does. Hence Gravity should seem to arise from the
agency of some subtile matter pressing towards the Sun and Planets, and
acting, like all mechanical causes, by contact. But on the other hand,
when we consider that the degree or force of Gravity is exactly in
proportion to the quantities of matter in those bodies, without any
regard to their bulks or quantity of surface, acting as freely on their
internal as external parts, it seems to surpass the power of mechanism;
and to be either the immediate agency of the Deity, or effected by a law
originally established and imprest on all matter by him. But some affirm
that matter, being altogether inert, cannot be impressed with any Law,
even by almighty Power: and that the Deity must therefore be constantly
impelling the Planets toward the Sun, and moving them with the same
irregularities and disturbances which Gravity would cause, if it could
be supposed to exist. But, if a man may venture to publish his own
thoughts, (and why should not one as well as another?) it seems to me no
greater absurdity, to suppose the Deity capable of superadding a Law, or
what Laws he pleases, to matter, than to suppose him capable of giving
it existence at first. The manner of both is equally inconceivable to
us; but neither of them imply a contradiction in our ideas: and what
implies no contradiction is within the power of Omnipotence. Do we not
see that a human creature can prepare a bar of steel so as to make it
attract needles and filings of iron; and that he can put a stop to that
power or virtue, and again call it forth again as often as he pleases?
To say that the workman infuses any new power into the bar, is saying
too much; since the needle and filings, to which he has done nothing,
re-attract the bar. And from this it appears that the power was
originally imprest on the matter of which the bar, needle, and filings
are composed; but does not seem to act until the bar be properly
prepared by the artificer: somewhat like a rope coiled up in a ship,
which will never draw a boat or any other thing towards the ship, unless
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account