Auroræ: Their Characters and SpectraCapron, J. Rand
History
Auroræ: Their Characters and Spectra
Capron, J. Rand
Auroras
(1) A small Geissler tube (No. 1) was lighted up by the small coil.
The capillary part showed a very bright, slightly rosy-tinted stream.
Negative bulb was filled with rosy-purple light, the violet-pole glow
being confined to the extent of the electrode. Positive bulb of the
same rosy-purple colour, but stream slightly contracted in volume. Glow
throughout quiescent, and no stratification in the tube. A compound-prism
spectroscope, taking in the whole of the spectrum, showed in the
capillary stream, from yellow to red, a fairly bright wedge, having a
dark band in the centre, and six bright columns, with dark lines at
intervals, shading off on either side. On the more refrangible side of
the yellow, the spectrum was composed of a set of bright bands and lines
in the green, blue, and purple, one line only (in the green) standing
out very bright. In the yellow and red no bright line stood out alone.
The positive bulb gave a fainter spectrum of the same character, mainly
confined to the centre, the violet, yellow, and red not being well seen.
When the violet-pole glow was examined, the general character of the
spectrum was quite changed: a brilliant broad band in the violet, a
bright narrower one in the blue, and two bright lines in the green, with
intermediate fainter lines throughout, were the main features. The yellow
and red part of the spectrum was also changed. The yellow was fairly
and evenly distinct up to the dark band; then came a somewhat brighter
orange band, and after that the red, but rather obscure and cut off. No
absolutely bright line could be traced in the red.
[Sidenote: Nitrogen-tube No. 2. Glow described. Difference of spectra of
capillary stream and violet-pole glow. Junction of the violet-pole glow
and capillary stream.]
(2) To compare the capillary stream and the violet-glow, a second
nitrogen-tube (No. 2) was used. This tube was larger in bulk and bore
than No. 1. The glow in the bulbs was considerably fainter and more
salmon-coloured; and there was much stratification in both, extending
to the capillary bore. (This stratification was considered due to H,
as the three principal lines of that gas came out very brightly in the
spectrum.) The difference of the spectra of the capillary stream and of
the violet-pole glow was extremely well marked—the former consisting of
a set of bright lines and bands of fairly uniform intensity, while the
latter was split up into a few bright bands with fainter lines between.
The yellow and red of the violet-glow were very weak as compared with
the same region of the capillary spectrum. No bright line appeared in
the red. The tube being properly adjusted for the purpose, the junction
of the violet-pole glow and the capillary red-glow was easily observed.
The bright bands of the violet-pole were seen to run into the capillary
line-spectrum, and then, gradually getting finer and more pointed, to
fade out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account