Auroræ: Their Characters and SpectraCapron, J. Rand
History
Auroræ: Their Characters and Spectra
Capron, J. Rand
Auroras
(2) They were closely connected with the Aurora, and they were greater
as the motion of the rays was more rapid and fitful and the prismatic
colours more intense. Quiescent and regular arches, without changing rays
or streamers, exercised mostly no influence on the needle.
[Sidenote: Declination-needle, effects on.]
(3) In all the disturbances the declination-needle moved towards the
east, and the horizontal intensity decreased while the inclination
increased.
Sir John Franklin sums up his information as to the needle to much
the same effect, viz. that brilliant and active coruscations cause a
deflection almost invariably if they appear through a hazy atmosphere
and if the prismatic colours are exhibited in the beams or arches. On
the contrary, when the air is clear and the Aurora presents a steady
dense light of a yellow colour and without motion, the needle is often
unaffected by its appearance.
[Sidenote: Parry’s experience.]
Parry (Third Voyage) found his variation-needle (extremely light and
delicately suspended) in no instance affected by the Auroræ; but he seems
to have principally met with the quiescent form of that phenomenon.
M. Lottin, the French savant (whose description of an Auroral display has
been given in Chapter II.), observed in the North Sea, between September
1838 and April 1839, while the sun was below the horizon, 150 Auroræ.
During this period 64 were visible, “besides many which a cloudy sky
concealed, but the presence of which was indicated by the disturbances
they produced upon the magnetic needle” (Lardner’s ‘Museum of Science and
Art,’ vol. x. p. 189).
[Sidenote: Grand displays accompanied by motion of needle to the west.]
It has been remarked by some observers that grand displays of the Aurora
are frequently preceded or accompanied by an extraordinary motion of the
needle to the westward.
Captain Maguire found at Point Barrow (1852-54) that the appearance of
the Aurora in the south was connected with the motion of the magnet to
the east of the magnetic north, and if in the north to the west of the
same.
[Sidenote: Solar disturbances and Aurora.]
On an occasion in 1859 great solar disturbances were observed, the
Greenwich magnets were much disturbed, and a fine Aurora was visible.
[Sidenote: Cipoletti’s observation.]
Cipoletti, of Florence, remarks on the strong magnetic disturbances
at Vienna and Munich during the Auroræ of 4th February, 1872, and 4th
February, 1874.
[Sidenote: Dr. Thompson concludes that cylinders of Aurora cannot be
doubted to be magnets.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account