Australia -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Colonies -- Australia
The Socialists describe these various measures as a spurious form of
socialism calculated to increase the profits of a single class of the
community; but the Government do not trouble themselves about abstract
terms. They have steadily pursued a settled policy, and have
successively assisted the sugar, pastoral, and agricultural interests;
they are prepared, if necessary, to give substantial help to
cattle-owners in the disposal of their produce, and they intend to
propose amendments of the mining laws which will promote the further
development of the industry. Nor have the producers alone been
benefited; the working classes, who are the first to suffer in times of
depression, are sharing in the renewed prosperity of the country, and
have been able to take advantage of the increased demand for their
services.
[1] Quoted, by permission of the author, from an article contributed to
the _Australasian Review of Reviews_ by Mr. J. V. Chataway, one of the
members for Mackay.
[2] See footnote p. 66.
[3] Financial statement 1896, p. 14.
{82}
IV
_THE LAND POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND_
Differences of conditions between Australia and New Zealand--The Public
Works policy--Taxation on land--The Land Act of 1892--The Land for
Settlements Acts--The Government Advances to Settlers Acts--The
encouragement of settlement--The co-operative construction of Public
Works--The unemployed--Continuity of policy.
The Constitution of 1852, under which New Zealand obtained responsible
government, differed from those granted to the Australian Provinces in
the creation of Provincial as well as Central Authorities. Owing to
the mountainous character of many parts of both islands, and in the
absence of railways and other facilities for internal transit,
communication had been carried on principally by sea, and settlement,
instead of radiating from one point, as in New South Wales, Victoria,
and South Australia, had been diffused at Auckland, Wellington,
Christchurch, Dunedin, and other places of secondary importance. Under
these circumstances, while it was deemed advisable to create a Central
Government at Auckland, which was transferred to Wellington in 1865,
six elective {83} Provincial Councils were established, which, though
their legislative and executive powers were confined within specified
limits, promoted the continuance of the separate development of the
several portions of the Colony. In 1876 the Provincial Legislatures,
which had in the meanwhile been increased by a division of territories
to ten, were abolished by the Central Government, principally because
they impeded the execution of the national policy of the construction
of public works. The effects of the system, however, are still seen,
especially in the demands made in the House of Representatives that the
different districts shall share in the benefits of any proposed
expenditure of public funds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account