Australasian Fossils: A Students' Manual of PalaeontologyChapman, Frederick
Science
Australasian Fossils: A Students' Manual of Palaeontology
Chapman, Frederick
Paleontology -- Australia
Ethnology appears to throw more light upon the subject than does geology.
Australia has in the past been peopled by two distinct types of man.
(1), the ancestors of the Tasmanians, now alas, extinct, who according
to some authorities came by way of Australia from Papua through the
Malay Peninsula, passing over to Tasmania from the mainland before the
separation caused by the subsidence of the Bass Strait area; and who
were represented by a negroid or woolly-haired type: (2), the present
aboriginals of Australia, showing affinities with the Dravidians of
Southern India, a primitive race from whose original stock the white
Caucasian races of Europe were derived. By intermarriage with a negroid
race like the Melanesian, it is supposed that the black Caucasian gave
rise to the present Australian mixed aboriginal type, with negroid
features, but possessing the long black hair and keener intellect of the
"melanochroi," as the dark Eurasian stock was termed by Huxley.
=Aboriginal Implements.--=
The stone implements fashioned by the Tasmanian aboriginals were roughly
chipped and of primitive type, of such forms as used at the present day by
the Bushmen of South Africa, and representing the eoliths and palaeoliths
of early man in the south of England. The implements of the Australian
aboriginals on the other hand include besides these both flakes and
worked and polished tools, such as were produced by the Neolithic men of
Europe, as contrasted with the typically rough palaeolithic tools of the
Tasmanian, who never grooved his axes for hafting as did the Australian
aboriginal. According to some authorities the Tasmanians represent
palaeolithic or even eolithic man in the character of their implements;
whilst the Australian resembles the Middle or Mousterian stage of early
man in certain of their ethnological characters and in the forms of their
implements, although a marked exception is seen in their manufacture of
polished adzes, of the neolithic period and in the use of bone implements
such as were used in Europe in Upper Palaeolithic times. So far no human
remains or handiwork in the form of chipped implements have been found
in other than superficial deposits, either in Tasmania or Australia. The
incised bone-fragment found near Ballarat, in a bed of silt beneath a
sheet of basalt which flowed from Mount Buninyong, is believed by some
to be evidence of man's handiwork in the early Pleistocene, though by
others thought to have been cut by the teeth of the "marsupial lion"
(_Thylacoleo_). A stone axe of basalt, grooved for the purpose of
mounting in a handle, was found in gravel at Ballarat at a depth of 22
inches from the surface. This, however, is no proof of man's antiquity,
for superficial deposits of much greater depth are easily accumulated
within a short period. Another implement was found at Maryborough in
Queensland in gravels at a depth of 4 feet from the surface, but not
below the basalt of the main lead.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account