Australasian Fossils: A Students' Manual of PalaeontologyChapman, Frederick
Science
Australasian Fossils: A Students' Manual of Palaeontology
Chapman, Frederick
Paleontology -- Australia
The masterly generalisation of William Smith that strata can be identified
by their fossil contents established by close study of the rocks and
fossils of the British Oolites has been confirmed generally by subsequent
work. The comparative study of the fossil contents of rocks in widely
separated areas has proved to be the most valuable means by which the
correlation of the rocks can be effected and their identity of age
established. In some cases the recognition of a single fossil species
in two areas separated, perhaps, by thousands of miles may suffice to
demonstrate that the rocks are of the same age. For example, a graptolite
such as _Phyllograptus typus_ is found in many parts of the world, but has
only a very restricted range in time. It has been found only in rocks of
Lower Ordovician age. Its occurrence in Wales and in the rocks of Bendigo
practically suffices to establish the identity in age of the rocks in
these widely separated areas.
Generally, however, much closer study and a more detailed examination of a
large number of the fossils of a rock series are required before the age
of the rocks can be surely established and a safe correlation made with
distant localities.
The stratigraphical generalisations to be made from the study of fossils
however must be qualified by certain considerations. Among these are the
fact that our knowledge of the life forms of a given geological period is
necessarily incomplete, that the differences in the fossil contents of
rocks may depend not only on differences of age but also in the conditions
under which the organisms lived and the rocks were accumulated, and that
forms of life originating in one area do not spread themselves immediately
over the earth but migrate at velocities depending on their mode of life
and the presence or absence of barriers to their progress.
Our incomplete knowledge of the forms living in remote geological periods
arises partly from the fact that some forms had no permanent skeleton
and were therefore incapable of preservation, partly to the obliteration
of the skeletons of organisms through subsequent earth movements in the
rocks or through the solvent action of water. Many land forms, too,
probably disintegrated on the surface before deposits were formed over
the area. Apart from these causes which determine that a full knowledge
of the fossils from ancient rocks in particular, will never be acquired,
our knowledge is incomplete by reason either of difficulty of access to
certain areas or incomplete search. As a result of later discoveries
earlier conclusions based on incomplete evidence as to the age of a rock
series, have not infrequently been modified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account