Austria -- Description and travel; Hungary -- Description and travel
For generations back the Turks had been a thorn in the side of Hungary
and had worried the kings by their constant incursions. They persecuted
the land much as the Danes harried Britain, and thirty-six years after
Matthias’ death the culmination came in a terrific battle fought at
Mohács, where the Turks, in prodigious force and fury, almost wiped the
Hungarian nation off the face of the map. The reigning King, Louis II.,
was but a boy, and his army of 25,000 men was practically annihilated
by one twelve times as great, under Suleiman the Turk. Seven
archbishops and bishops and thousands of nobles laid down their lives
on the field that day, and the defeat was to the nation as poignant
and humiliating as the battle of Flodden Field was to Scotland. The
Turk has always stood out conspicuously as the only Mussulman power in
Europe, and in our time we have seen slice after slice cut away from
his territory and set up as independent kingdoms. The time is surely
not far distant when the Ottoman power will be pushed across into Asia,
to which it so much more fitly belongs; in fact, only the jealousies of
the great nations adjacent have so long delayed this consummation.
The Hungarians, driven frantic by their disasters, appealed to the
Kings of the House of Hapsburg for help, and accepted them as rulers,
alien though they were in blood and race. The solution was accepted
loyally by the majority of the people, but it led to little relief, for
even the Hapsburgs could not hold back the savage Turks, who overran
the great plain of Hungary, and were accepted as suzerains by the
people of Transylvania. For a century and a half before the year 1686
the Hungarian capital was in the hands of the Turks. Such divisions and
dissensions tore the nation in pieces, and there was nothing but misery
for the people.
“But,” writes the distinguished Hungarian, Dr. Julius de
Vargha, already quoted, “it was the national disaster that
displayed the heroic valour and ardent patriotism of the
Hungarian nation. Such splendid instances of intrepid bravery,
undaunted self-sacrifice and chivalrous virtues brighten
these dark pages of our history, that we may justly call this
period the heroic age of the Hungarian nation. But it was not
only military prowess that preserved the national character
of this country, torn, as it was, to pieces and bleeding from
a thousand wounds. It is remarkable that just at this very
period a rich and flourishing national literature sprang into
being. During the reign of Matthias humanistic literature and
culture took deep root in the country; its tongue however
was not Hungarian but Latin. The intellectual movement of
the Reformation made the soil of Hungary, that had already
been cultivated, bring forth a national literature, which the
struggle evoked by the anti-Reformation succeeded in fostering
to a higher development.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account