Antislavery movements -- United States; Slavery -- United States
It was distinctly maintained in 1776, that men may rightfully
fight for liberty, and resist the powers ordained of God, if those
powers destroyed liberty. Christian men, ministers in their pulpits
strenuously argued that it was men’s _duty_ to fight for liberty, and
to kill those who opposed them. Prayer was offered to God for success
in this process of resistance and blood; and good men implored and
obtained help from other nations, to complete the work of resistance to
oppression, and death to the oppressors.
I do not say that these positions were right, or that the men of
1776 acted right. But I do say, that _if_ they were right, we are
necessarily led to some startling conclusions. For there are now three
millions of people of America grievously wronged by the government
they live under. _If_ it was right in 1776 to resist, fight, and
kill, to secure liberty,--it is right to do the same in 1852. _If_
three millions of whites might rightfully resist the powers ordained
of God, then three millions of blacks may rightfully do the same.
_If_ France was justified in aiding our band of revolutionists to
fight for liberty, then a foreign nation may lawfully aid men now to
vindicate their rights. _If_, as the men of 1776 declared, “when a
long train of abuses evinces a design to reduce them _under absolute
despotism_, it is their right, it is their _duty_, to throw off such
government,”--then it is the duty of three millions of men in 1852,
to throw off the government which reduces them to the frightful and
absolute despotism of chattel slavery.
But what were the oppressions, which, in 1776, justified revolt,
battle, and one hundred thousand deaths? They are stated in the
“Declaration of Independence,” are familiar to all, and will therefore
only be abridged here. The powers ordained of God over the men of
1776,--“restrained their trade,”--“refused assent to laws enacted
by the local legislature,”--“kept soldiers to overawe them,”--“did
not punish soldiers for killing a few colonists,”--“imposed taxes
without their consent,”--“in some cases, did not allow them trial
by jury,”--“abolished good laws,”--“made war on them, in case of
disobedience.”
These were the wrongs they complained of. But nearly all their rights
were untouched. They had schools and colleges, and could educate their
children; they could become intelligent and learned themselves; they
could acquire property, and large numbers of them had become rich; they
could emigrate without hindrance to any other country, when weary of
the oppressions of their own; they could elect their own town and state
officers; they could keep swords, muskets, powder and ball in their own
houses; they could not be lashed and sold like brutes; they were never
compelled to work without wages; they could appeal to courts of justice
for protection.
Let us now hear a statement of the wrongs inflicted on three millions
of Americans in 1852.
We have no rights left to us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account