Antislavery movements -- United States; Slavery -- United States
The brotherhood of nations is an idea to which philanthropy only could
give birth. Its home is in the hearts of all good men, and yet, until
Kossuth came before the world, that idea had been esteemed so vast in
its circumference, so out of the reach of means, so far beyond the
grasp of present experience and possibility, that he would have been
thought a fanatic or a fool who attempted it. He, indeed, by power
strictly personal, not only seized upon it as a practical thought,
and nobly argued it, but has actually and bravely entered upon the
experiment, and forced it upon the conceptions of the world, and
organized, not in our country only, but in Europe, plans and parties
for its realization. Here is not only a great _thought_, but a great
_deed_. To gather up the philanthropic minds or the patriot minds of
the world to embrace such an enterprise as not only a dutiful but
practicable scheme, is an achievement that leaves out of sight any
other achievement of eighteen hundred years.
It is not the development of abstract principles in science, in
philosophy, or in religion, that establishes the highest claim to the
world’s gratitude and admiration. It is the successful application
of those principles to human life and conduct, the setting them to
work to restore the world to the shape and aspect which God gave it,
that demonstrates the God-like in man. It is the manifestation of a
great idea upon the external, as God’s great thoughts are manifested
by the landscape, the ocean, and the heavens, by which we arrive at
the spiritual power that conceived them. A patriot indeed! The great
Hungarian _did_ attempt to link America to his great purpose by appeals
to her patriotism. It was the only common sentiment between our country
and him. It is America’s loftiest thought. Her beau-ideal of public
virtue. I don’t mean that there was no Christianity or philanthropy in
the United States when Kossuth came amongst us; but I do mean that,
as a nation, we had none of them. He came on an errand of practical
philanthropy; to appeal to our national heart, and cause the only cord
of humanity in it that could be touched, to vibrate in unison with
his own in behalf of the down-trodden nations of the world. He wished
to engage its organic power in behalf of national law. Had Kossuth
appealed to any higher principle, he would have overshot his mark. Love
of country is common, to the Christian and to the mere patriot. In the
latter it is only selfishness, in the former genuine philanthropy.
American patriotism was the only aperture through which he could reach
our nation’s heart, to raise it to the higher region of philanthropy,
and place it in his own bosom, and impregnate it with his own holy
sentiments, that their sympathies might circulate together for a
common brotherhood. He represented Hungary. He appeared at our door
as an outraged brother, to enlist us in behalf of a brother’s rights
and wrongs. He sought to excite in the nation’s bosom the activity of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account