Now if there be “fools in the nineteenth century,” as I devoutly hope there be,—men possessed with the belief of a Higher Law, Inalienable Rights, Supremacy of Conscience, and such like obsolete phantoms, and passing strange judgments on the deeds of men, and nations in the light thereof,—I beg to put in a similar plea for them. _Give them leave to speak their minds._ Now and then, it may be worth the pondering, and, heeded betimes, may, peradventure, save from calamity and ruin. If not, an attempt to _enforce_ silence on fools—and is it not much the same with freemen?—is likely to produce, not silence at all, but a greater outcry. And as for our great and wise men, when hit, let them conceal the smart, and profit by the lesson. But, for their own greatness’ sake, and the honour of their wisdom, whether hit or not, let them never fall into a passion at the freedom of men’s speech, and cry, _This must be put down_. For it will not down at their bidding. But the subject refuses to be treated lightly. The vast interest at stake on both sides, and the immediate urgency of crisis, compel the mind to sobriety and solicitude in the contemplation of it. No truly wise man will look upon the anti-slavery doctrine as mere folly, or on the promulgation of it as idle breath. It is the measureless power of that sentiment, and all its power lies in its truth—that wakens this alarm; and it is the consciousness of holding such a weapon in their hands, that makes the anti-slavery masses at the North pause, lest, in attempting to use it for good, they should, unwittingly, do harm. For such a sentiment, who can fail to feel respect? Who would not despise himself if his own bosom were destitute of it? But, by as much as I respect it in others, and would cherish it in myself, by so much will I resent all playing upon it by political men for party or personal ends, and fear lest it betray me into pusillanimity and inertness where the times demand action for humanity and God. It _is_ a serious question for all honest anti-slavery men throughout the land, in what way they can most wisely and hopefully quit them of their responsibility in relation to this thing. Their actions as citizens should, unquestionably, be restricted by the just limits of their civil responsibility; as men by those of their moral responsibility. Even within those limits, they should act with a wise moderation, and in a generous spirit of candour and kindness. But one thing is abundantly certain, that by ignoring the responsibility, they do not get rid of it; by turning their backs on the obligation, they will not get it discharged. Still the terrible _fact_ remains. _Still the tears and blood of the enslaved are daily dropping on our country’s soil._ Throw over it what veil of extenuation and excuse you may, the essential crime and shame remains. Believe as kindly as you can of the treatment which the slaves receive of humane and