To the king, my lord, thy servant, ... verily peace to the king,
my lord. May Ashur and Beltu be gracious to the king, my lord.
Concerning the overseer of the house of the seers, who is dead, as
I said in the presence of the king, my lord, to wit, his son, his
brother’s son, are alive. Now his son, his brother’s son, and
Simânai, the son of Nabû-uballiṭ, and the son of the father’s
brother, of Ashur-nâ’id, the deputy priest, with them, shall come
into the presence of the king, my lord. Whoever shall find favor
in the sight of the king, my lord, let the king, my lord, appoint.
It is clear that succession was not purely hereditary. Even when the son
was alive, he might be passed over in favor of a cousin, or for a still
more distant relation. There are many other interesting cases where the
king inquires for the proper persons to be placed in the offices vacated
through death or deposition. For example, when Esarhaddon began to set in
order the temple services, he heard the following report:(942)
To the king, my lord, thy servant Akkullânu. Peace be to the king,
my lord. Nabû and Marduk be gracious to the king, my lord. In the
long desuetude of the customary rights of Ashur, regarding which
the king, my lord, sent word to his servant, saying, “Who among
the magnates have not complied, have not given, be it much or
little (their default),” yesterday I could not write to the king,
my lord. Now these are the magnates who have not given their dues:
the governors of Barḫalza, Raṣappa, Kalzi, Isana, Bêlê, Kullania,
Arpadda; these have failed to pay their dues. Raṣappa, Barḫalza,
Diḳuḳina, the chief of the vineyards, Daian-Adadi, Isana,
Ḫalziatbar, Birtu, Arzuḫina, Arbailu, Guzana, Sharish, Diḫnunna,
Rimusu, all these have not given the barley and wheat due from
them. And as to the overseer of the bakehouse, the overseer of the
larder and the chief purveyors, concerning whom the king, my lord,
inquired, they are removed from their posts, and this is alleged
as the reason: The overseer of the bakehouse is a child,
Sennacherib removed him; Ashur-zêr-iddin, the priest of Nineveh,
slandered him. I was frightened at the troubles. He had not
committed any great crime.... The overseer of the larder had
broken (?) a dish of Ashur’s, for this deed thy father removed him
from charge of Ashur’s dish, and appointed a turban-maker’s son;
he is without education. And concerning the chief purveyors,
Sennacherib made a reduction of their allowances, and the son of
the turban-maker receives the rest. Now for six years he has been
dead and his son indeed stands in his office. Justice has been in
abeyance since Sargon. Sennacherib was the remover. This is
according to their reasons. The king, my lord, as he will, let him
do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account