Apil-ilishu and Pala-Shamash dispute the latter’s right to a house, ship, servants, money, and property in his possession. The city elders from Ḥuda and Shibabi gave judgment and confirmed the title of Pala-Shamash.(189) The sons of Nûr-Shamash sue Bêlitum for the property left her. Before judges. Nonsuited. Sumu-lâ-ilu.(190) Shunu-ma-ili and Mâr-erṣitim sue Ribatum concerning her right to the legacy of Salâ and Mullubtim. The judges assign her an income, _ḫibiltu_. Samsu-iluna 2.(191) Marduk-mubaliṭ and Sin-idinnam sue Shâd-Malkat concerning her house in Bît Gagim. Judges confirm her title. Apil-Sin.(192) Ḥuzalum and Pî-Malkat, children of Nabi-Shamash implead Shidi-lamazatanḫu of Gagim concerning various rights to incomes and rations in the temple of Shamash. The judges assign shares to each. Samsu-iluna (?).(193) Aliḳu and Sumu-ramê sue Shakumâtim about a house they sold him. Nonsuited. N. D.(194) Shamash-bêl-ili repudiates a sale of land to the Lady Mannashi. He is nonsuited. Ḥammurabi 15.(195) Family of Ardi-rabish against Erib-Sin on account of property left them by Ardi-rabish. Nonsuited. Sin-mubalit 20.(196) Ḥamaziru sues Manutum for house and property but is nonsuited. Sumu-lâ-ilu.(197) Kasha-Upi bought a house of Itti-itishu and his sons, Bêlshunu and Ilushu-bânî. Amêl-Ninshuna, son of Bêlshunu, brought a suit about the house. Judges condemn him to be branded on the forehead and confirm Kasha-Upi’s title. Sin-mubalit.(198) Nishinishu sues Ana-erishti-Malkat for three _SAR_ of land before the king’s judges. Nonsuited. Samsu-iluna 2.(199) Malkat-kuzub-mâtim sues Ani-talime for restitution of a field, before the judges of Babylon and Sippara. The witnesses sustain her claim, which is granted. Samsu-iluna 3.(200) The family of Izidaria sue the family of Azalîa about the property of Izidaria deceased. Their title is confirmed. Zabum 12.(201) Shamash-bêl-ili sues Nidnusha concerning a house bought by him of her. The judges grant him two shekels of silver. Ḥammurabi 1.(202) Shî-lamazi sues her brothers for a field and wins her case.(203) Before Lushtamar, _nâgiru_ of Babylon, Adadi-idinnam and Ibku-Ishtar, judges, Zariku was put to the oath and replied to Erib-Sin. He was told that as his domicile was at Sippara, he must not make his appeal to the judges of Babylon. So his case was dismissed. Ḥammurabi 28.(204) The record is defective. Cases before judges where the plea and its result can be made out with some certainty are as follows: