The cleaning out of 60 cubic yards of sewage and the removal of the old drains did not in the slightest degree diminish the nuisance inside the building, consequently the 15-inch drain on the opposite side of the building was stopped off at G and H, and in testing the detector was placed at G. This length of drain being 140 feet contained 175–1098/1728 cubic feet of gas, and 4 gals. 4 pts. 8 ozs. of water thrown into the trap H should have lifted the liquid to the usual height in the detector. This and a similar quantity of water did not indicate any compression, but the discoloration of the reagent in the detector was much quicker than on the drain which was first tested. The drain was then opened at I, dividing it into two sections, that from G to I containing 93 cubic feet. Testing this by 2 gals. 3 pts. 6 ozs. of water gave the exact rise in the detector, consequently the leaks and bad gas must be in the section from I to H. This was tested by a fresh reagent in the detector, when the speedy discoloration of the liquid indicated that the source of the poison was very near. By a few piercings of the ground at K, by the iron rod or searcher, the drain was found, and by following the old drain the two cesspits and additional drains shown in Plate 3 were discovered, and about 150 loads of old putrid sewage had to be excavated and cleared away. The leaks which prevented the rise of the liquid in the detector were in the crown of the old sewage tank M, and the hot-water pipes of the heating apparatus running in an air-shaft just over it, the heat extracted the poisons from the sewage and distributed them into the ward. The connections at K and N having been stopped up, the drain from I H was again tested, when it gave 36 cubic feet more gas space than there should have been in the drain. A few piercings of the soil at O led to the excavating of those old drains which are shown attached, and these being excavated and cleared away, and the connections to drains K, N, and O being stopped, the drain was again tested from I to H, when compression in the detector took place in comparison to the exact quantity of gas that should be by measurement in the drain. In describing the method of testing drains as shown on Plates 1, 2, and 3, nothing has been mentioned as to the level to which branch drains to houses should be laid, or the method of testing them to ascertain their fall. The fall given to branch drains should not be less than 1 in 100, but 1 in 80 is far preferable, and if the drains are laid to this level, water will flow easily through them, but should any part be laid out of a level the water would lay in them and thus give a less quantity of gas. Then when tested by compression to the capacity of the drain the lesser quantity would denote the nature of the dip.