Bahá'u'lláh and the New EraEsslemont, J. E. (John Ebenezer)
Religion
Bahá'u'lláh and the New Era
Esslemont, J. E. (John Ebenezer)
Bahai Faith; Bahá'u'lláh, 1817-1892
Knowledge is like unto wings for the being (of man) and is like a
ladder for ascending. To acquire knowledge is incumbent upon all,
but of those sciences which may profit the people of the earth,
and not such sciences as being in mere words and end in mere
words. The possessors of sciences and arts have a great right
among the people of the world. Indeed, the real treasury of man is
his knowledge. Knowledge is the means of honor, prosperity, joy,
gladness, happiness and exaltation.—Tablet of Tajallíyát.
Treatment of Criminals
In a talk on the right method of treating criminals, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá spoke as
follows:—
... the most essential thing is that the people must be educated
in such a way ... that they will avoid and shrink from
perpetrating crimes, so that the crime itself will appear to them
as the greatest chastisement, the utmost condemnation and torment.
Therefore no crimes which require punishment will be committed....
... if someone oppresses, injures, and wrongs another, and the
wronged man retaliates, this is vengeance, and is censurable. ...
If ‘Amr dishonours Zaid, the latter has not the right to dishonour
‘Amr; if he does so, this is vengeance, and is very reprehensible.
No, rather he must return good for evil, and not only forgive, but
also, if possible, be of service to his oppressor. This conduct is
worthy of man; for what advantage does he gain by vengeance? The
two actions are equivalent; if one action is reprehensible, both
are reprehensible. The only difference is that one was committed
first, the other later.
But the community has the right of defense and of self-protection;
moreover, the community has no hatred nor animosity for the
murderer: it imprisons or punishes him merely for the protection
and security of others. ...
Thus when Christ said: “Whosoever shall smite thee on the right
cheek, turn to him the left one also,” it was for the purpose of
teaching men not to take personal revenge. He did not mean that if
a wolf should fall upon a flock of sheep and wish to destroy it,
that the wolf should be encouraged to do so. No, if Christ had
known that a wolf had entered the fold and was about to destroy
the sheep, most certainly he would have prevented it. ...
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account