Bahaism and Its Claims: A Study of the Religion Promulgated by Baha Ullah and Abdul BahaWilson, Samuel Graham
Religion
Bahaism and Its Claims: A Study of the Religion Promulgated by Baha Ullah and Abdul Baha
Wilson, Samuel Graham
Bahai Faith -- Controversial literature
Christian churches to the sceptic." Elsewhere he says:[131] "It must be
clearly understood that Babism (or Bahaism) is in no sense
latitudinarian or eclectic, and stands therefore in the sharpest
antagonism to Sufism. However vague Babi doctrine may be on certain
points, it is essentially _dogmatic_, and every utterance or command
uttered by the Manifestation of the Period, _i. e._, Bab or Baha Ullah
or Abbas Effendi must be accepted without reserve."[132] Similarly Dr.
G. W. Holmes[133] writes: "Baha's appeal is only to his own word and to
his own arbitrary and forced interpretation of the Word of God, which
interpretations, as he states, find their sanction solely in his own
authority."
There are other claims of Bahaism of a specific nature which might be
considered. They would be found equally assertive and equally
groundless. Bahaism reminds me of a horse which was offered for sale in
Persia. It appeared like a fat and well fed animal. But the would-be
purchaser was warned that its skin had been puffed up with air which
would soon leak out, and he would have on his hands a lean, lank, bony
_yabi_ scrub. Bahaism does not even stop short of claiming that the
civilization of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is due to it. Its
braggart attitude may be fittingly symbolized by Rostand's "Chanticler,"
standing in the barnyard, flapping its wings in vain exultation,
imagining that it, by its crowing, has caused the sun to rise.
FOOTNOTES:
[91] "The Bahai Movement," p. 73.
[92] _Contemporary Review_, March, 1912.
[93] In "Unity Through Love."
[94] "The Bahai Movement," p. 39.
[95] _Ibid._, p. 27.
[96] _S. W._, Oct. 1912, p. 190.
[97] "Story of the Bahai Movement," p. 4.
[98] June 29, 1912.
[99] _S. W._, Sept. 27, 1912.
[100] _S. W._, Sept. 8, 1912.
[101] Professor Browne, in the Ency. of Ethics and Religion, article
"Bab," writes: "The Bahais are strongly antagonistic alike to the Sufis
and the Mohammedans, but for quite different reasons. In the case of the
Sufis they object to their latitudinarianism, their Pantheism, their
individualism and their doctrine of the inner light. With the Mohammedan
they resent the persecutions they have suffered. The Bahais detest the
Azalis, the followers of Abbas Effendi dislike and despise the followers
of his brother Mehemet Ali."
[102] _S. W._, Aug. 20, 1914.
[103] "Brilliant Proof," pp. 26-28.
[104] _S. W._, Nov. 23, 1913, p. 238.
[105] _S. W._, April 9, 1914.
[106] _S. W._, July 13, 1913, p. 122.
[107] "The Universal Religion."
[108] "Bahai Movement," p. 75.
[109] Page 54. In Dealy's "Dawn of Knowledge," the chapter on Baha Ullah
is entitled "Prince of Peace."
[110] _S. W._, Vol. IV, pp. 6, 8 and 254.
[111] "Answered Questions," p. 74; "Tablet of the World," p. 28.
[112] "Trav.'s Narr.," p. 287.
[113] "New Hist.," pp. 378, 379.
[114] _Ibid._, p. 380.
[115] "Trav.'s Narr.," pp. 65-67.
[116] See Chapter VI.
[117] "A Message from Acca," p. 9.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account