Humorous stories; Legal stories; London (England) -- Fiction; Trials (Breach of promise) -- Fiction
It is requisite, says Mr. John Pitt Taylor (p. 500) speaking of "hearsay
evidence" that whatever facts a witness speaks, he should be confined to
those lying within his own knowledge. For every witness should give his
testimony on oath, and should be subject to cross examination. But
testimony from the relation of third persons cannot be subject to these
tests. This rule of exclusion has been recognised as a fundamental
principle of the law of evidence ever since the time of Charles II. To
this he adds a note, with all due gravity: "The rule excluding heresay
evidence, or rather the mode in which that rule is frequently
misunderstood in Courts of Justice, is amusingly caricatured by Mr.
Dickens _in his report_ of the case of Bardell _v._ Pickwick, p. 367."
Bardell _v._ Pickwick! He thus puts it with the many thousand or tens of
thousand cases quoted, and he has even found a place for it in his index
of places. He then goes on to quote the passage, just as he would quote
from Barnwall and Adolphus.
How sagacious--full of legal point--is Boz's comment on Winkle's
incoherent evidence. Phunky asked him whether he had any reason to
suppose that Pickwick was about to be married. "'Oh no; certainly not,'
replied Mr. Winkle with so much eagerness, that Mr. Phunky ought to have
got him out of the box with all possible dispatch. Lawyers hold out that
there are two kinds of particularly bad witnesses: a reluctant witness,
and a too willing witness;" and most true it is. Both commit themselves
in each case, but in different ways. The matter of the former, and the
manner of the latter do the mischief. The ideal witness affects
indifference, and is as impartial as the record of a phonograph. It is
wonderful where Boz learned all this. No doubt from his friend Talfourd,
K.C., who carefully revised "The Trial."
Skimpin's interpretation of Mr. Pickwick's consolatory phrase, which he
evidently devised on the spur of the moment, shows him to be a very
ready, smart fellow.
'Now, Mr. Winkle, I have only one more question to ask you, and I beg
you to bear in mind his Lordship's caution. Will you undertake to
swear that Pickwick, the Defendant, did not say on the occasion in
question--"My dear Mrs. Bardell, you're a good creature; compose
yourself to this situation, for to this situation you must come," or
words to that effect?'
'I--I didn't understand him so, certainly,' said Mr. Winkle,
astounded at this ingenious dove-tailing of the few words he had
heard. 'I was on the staircase, and couldn't hear distinctly; the
impression on my mind is--'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account