The phenomenon which is popularly known as “reaction,” and which occurs
after both hot and cold baths, is a most remarkable one, and seems
to show that our bodies resent any interference with their function.
Thus experiments have shown that if the temperature of a healthy man
be raised or depressed by any artificial means, such as hot or cold
baths, the subsequent reaction in the direction of the depression or
exaltation of the temperature is such that the mean temperature of
health is accurately maintained. A German observer, Jurgensen, found
by a series of accurate observations on a patient who submitted to
a series of baths of a temperature of 50° Fahr., each bath lasting
twenty-five minutes, that notwithstanding the rapid abstraction of
heat, which gave rise to shivering, lasting for several hours, the
diminution of bodily temperature which occurred during the bath was
followed, after an interval of four or five hours, by an elevation
which precisely compensated it, so that the mean normal temperature was
maintained in spite of the interference of the physiologist.
It will have been observed that the ultimate result of both hot and
cold bathing, if conducted in moderation, is about the same, viz., an
increased circulation of blood through the skin. In both cases also,
the combustion going on within the body is increased, as evidenced by
the escape of an increased quantity of carbonic acid from the lungs.
In the case of the cold bath, this increased combustion is due to the
stimulating effect of the cold water, while in the hot bath it is due
to the artificial heat facilitating the natural combustion processes
of the body. The effects of the hot and cold bath upon the combustion
processes going on in the body may, not inaptly, be compared to the
effect produced upon a furnace by the hot and cold blast, both of which
encourage combustion and increase the heat given off by the furnace;
but the hot blast so facilitates combustion that the same work is done
by its aid, with an expenditure of 2-1/2 tons of coal, that is done
by the cold blast with an expenditure of 8 tons of coal. If we want a
fire to burn well, we have several courses open to us; the first is to
poke it, which may be regarded as simple stimulation; the second is to
supply it with a cold blast, in which case we supply large quantities
of oxygen, but at the same time counteract the heating effect by
the coldness of the blast. By employing a hot blast, the combustion
is facilitated without any counteracting chilling. By each of these
methods we hasten the ultimate extinguishing of the fire, unless
fresh fuel be added. The employment of the hot blast entails the most
economical use of the fuel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account