Battle Honours of the British Army: From Tangier, 1662, to the Commencement of the Reign of King Edward VIINorman, Charles Boswell
History
Battle Honours of the British Army: From Tangier, 1662, to the Commencement of the Reign of King Edward VII
Norman, Charles Boswell
Great Britain -- History, Military; Great Britain. Army -- History
This distinction was accorded to the Cheshire Regiment for its
services in Scinde--services which brought to the regiment the two
battle honours "Meeanee" and "Hyderabad." The distinction has not
been conferred on the Bombay native regiments which fought side
by side with the Cheshires in the brilliant and hardly-contested
campaign on the banks of the Indus.
MEEANEE, FEBRUARY 17, 1843.
This battle honour, which commemorates the victory gained by the
army commanded by General Sir Charles Napier over the Amirs of
Scinde, is borne by the following regiments:
Cheshires.
34th Poona Horse.
35th Scinde Horse.
36th Jacob's Horse.
2nd Queen's Own Sappers and Miners.
112th Infantry.
125th Outram's Rifles.
The hostilities with the Amirs of Scinde were the direct but
inevitable result of the first Afghan War. With some difficulty
we had succeeded in obtaining the consent of some of the Amirs
to the passage of the Bombay column of the army of Afghanistan
through their country; but the people themselves were very averse
to this concession. It was laying them open to future annexation,
as they wisely conjectured. The passage of our convoys through
their territories was an irresistible attraction to Baluch
marauders, and, not content with robbery, they cut up stragglers
with impunity. Then we demanded satisfaction, and finally the Amirs
undertook to enter into a treaty, by which they were compelled
to pay the cost of a force which we maintained in Scinde for the
purpose of safeguarding our lines of communication. Our reverses
in Afghanistan, as well as the defeat they themselves inflicted
on our troops in the neighbourhood of Kahun, and one or two other
regrettable incidents, led the Amirs to underrate our strength.
They not only neglected to keep up the payments for the army of
occupation, but they consistently violated the treaty in every
possible way. Frequent attacks were made on parties of troops, and
it was evident either that the Amirs would not, or could not keep
their people in order.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account