Battle Honours of the British Army: From Tangier, 1662, to the Commencement of the Reign of King Edward VIINorman, Charles Boswell
History
Battle Honours of the British Army: From Tangier, 1662, to the Commencement of the Reign of King Edward VII
Norman, Charles Boswell
Great Britain -- History, Military; Great Britain. Army -- History
Sir Charles Napier was despatched to Hyderabad to compel respect
to the treaty. The Amirs retaliated by attacking the Residency.
Fortunately, a small vessel belonging to the Indian Marine was
lying in the Indus, some few miles from the Residency, and Major
(afterwards General) Sir James Outram was enabled to beat off his
assailants, and to reach the steamer in safety. Napier was a man of
action. Knowing that the Amirs were within a few miles of the city,
he at once marched to attack them. He calculated their numbers
at between 30,000 and 40,000 men, well armed with matchlock and
sabres. His own force was just 2,600 men, with twelve guns. This
included but one British battalion--the 22nd (Cheshires)--barely
600 men, all armed with the old flintlock Brown Bess--a weapon
which, though a more rapid loader than the matchlock, was its
inferior in range. The Amirs had taken up a strong position in a
large wooded game-preserve, surrounded with a low mud wall. The
one entrance Napier closed with a company of the 22nd, and then he
assaulted the place, after he had thoroughly shaken the defenders
with a searching fire from his twelve guns. The Baluchis fought
well, but this happened to be one of the sepoys' fighting days,
and, after three hours' hard firing, the Baluchis were driven off
in confusion. Estimates vary as to their losses. Napier himself put
it at 5,000 killed; others put it as low as 500.
If the General's estimate was a correct one, then we must put
aside the old saying that it took a ton of lead to kill a man with
Brown Bess. When we consider the strength of the position held
by the Baluchis and their enormous superiority in numbers, the
losses incurred in gaining such a decisive victory were by no means
excessive.
CASUALTIES AT MEEANEE.
+----------------------+-----------+-----------+
| |_Officers._| _Men._ |
| _Regiments._ +-----+-----+-----+-----+
| | K. | W. | K. | W. |
+----------------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
|22nd Cheshires | 1 | 5 | 23 | 52 |
|Royal Artillery | - | - | 1 | 4 |
|34th Poona H. | - | - | - | - |
|35th Scinde H. | - | - | - | - |
|36th Jacob's H. | - | - | - | - |
|3rd Q.O. Sappers | - | - | - | 3 |
|9th Bengal Cavalry | 1 | 5 | 3 | 29 |
|101st Grenadiers | - | - | 1 | 4 |
|112th Infantry | 3 | 2 | 12 | 45 |
|125th Outram's Rifles | 1 | 2 | 16 | 27 |
+----------------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
NOTE.--The 101st Grenadiers were present at Meeanee, were
mentioned in Sir C. Napier's despatch and captured a Baluch
standard, but they have not as yet been awarded the battle honour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account