Battles of the nineteenth century, vol. 1 of 7 — John Shaqi
Battles of the nineteenth century, vol. 1 of 7Henty, G. A. (George Alfred)
History
Battles of the nineteenth century, vol. 1 of 7
Henty, G. A. (George Alfred)
Battles; Military history, Modern -- 19th century
The final Russian attack was made about 10 a.m., the sharpest and best
intentioned of any in the day, but by this time the opponents were
more equal in numbers. Bosquet’s Frenchmen had come up to support, and
we had gained the help of the two celebrated 18-pounder guns under
Collingwood Dickson, which 150 artillerymen themselves dragged from
the 1st Division camp to the field. This, with two batteries of French
Horse Artillery, pushed gallantly forward to the “bare slopes fronting
the enemy,” had readjusted the balance of artillery fire; and at last
the Russians fell back, sullenly, overmastered, but they were followed
by no final charge. “When hopeless of success,” the enemy “seemed to
melt from the lost field; the English were too few and too exhausted;
the French too little confident in the advantage gained to convert the
repulse into a rout.” The victory at Inkerman was but the prelude to
terrible sufferings during the long-protracted siege, but these could
be borne with patience, because Inkerman had proved that we were more
than a match for the Russians in the open field. Had we not won the
battle, the whole of the allied armies, taken in reverse, would have
been swept off the plateau in front of Sebastopol right into the sea.
The fortress itself proved a very hard nut to crack, and although
frequently assaulted, was never actually taken by force of arms. The
winter troubles, the inclement weather, the difficulties of supply
which starved the troops and reduced the siege into a mere blockade,
forbade attack. On the contrary, the besieged displayed such activity
under the intrepid Todleben, that the initiative often passed to them,
and by bold sorties they gained ground rather than lost it. Even our
incessant bombardments, causing terrific carnage, did not dismay the
defenders, and fresh reinforcements constantly arrived. It was not till
June that the first real assault was delivered, and then only through
the indomitable determination of the allied generals. The French were
especially hampered by the interference of the Emperor Napoleon, who,
with no military knowledge, claimed to control and advise from Paris.
It was the first occasion on which the telegraph line began to be
largely used in campaigning, a practice greatly calculated to paralyse
the action of generals in the field. Napoleon was all in favour of
leaving the siege to linger on, while field armies cut off the supplies
to the fortress; but Pelissier, the French general, was a strong man
who held to his own views, and he persisted in attacking Sebastopol.
[Illustration: SIR COLIN CAMPBELL (AFTERWARDS LORD CLYDE).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account