Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
JAMES GRANT, examined by Mr. C. A. Smyth, stated: I am a shipwright,
with about forty years’ experience in the business, and amongst
shipping. I have a certificate for navigation as chief officer. I got
it in 1875. I also passed my examination before the Steam Navigation
Board as marine engineer. I have seen the S. S. _Alert_ running up
and down the Bay several times as a Bay trader. Some repairs were
effected to her machinery in the year 1893, some months before she
was lost. Messrs. Robinson Bros. had the contract for the job, and I
was engaged as their ship carpenter to carry out the shipwrighting
work. I was working on her two months altogether. Speaking of her
generally, she had very fine lines. The model now shown me appears
to be like her. There is no bearing here (pointing to bottom of
model). To give her stability, the flat part should be carried
further along. There is no bearing until the bulging part touches
the water, and it would have the effect of throwing her deep in the
water aft. She was about 170 feet long, her breadth eighteen or
nineteen feet, and her depth between nine and ten feet. In my opinion
the _Alert_ was very long for her beam and for her depth. According
to the _Alert’s_ certificate of register, she came out from England
as a three masted schooner, or barque, under sail only. When I was
making the alterations she had only one mast, a foremast, as shown
in that model. The captain’s bridge went right across the ship, and
there was a gangway going fore and aft on the starboard side, from
the bridge to the poop. There was nothing on the port side at all.
The stoke-hole would be about twelve feet in width athwart ships,
and about five feet fore and aft. It was covered over with a grating
composed of ¾-inch iron running fore and aft, and these bars were
about two inches apart. There was no provision made for covering
this grating with a tarpaulin by means of cleats. Nor was there any
provision made for covering any of the skylights. There was nothing
to prevent the water getting through either grating or skylights.
If water went through either of these places, it would go into the
engine room and stoke-hole. The height of the ship’s bulwarks above
the main deck was four feet six inches. The breadth of the alleyways
between the bulwarks and the side of the machinery casing would be
about three feet at the narrowest part, and five feet further on.
There was a port hole in the bulwarks opposite; but if the vessel
shipped water while lying on her side, that port could not discharge
inside water, and there was no provision for discharging water in
the alleyways except that port hole. I remember the window made for
passing food to the saloon. I did not make it. Originally it must
have been cut out of the iron. It was a glass window about 16 x 14
inches, with a wooden frame. I did not notice how it opened; but
if it opened inwards it would be a source of danger if the vessel
shipped much water aft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account