Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
Moreover, as if to make matters still more sensational, somebody
conveyed the news to Ponting’s wife, at South Melbourne, that her
husband was amongst the lost, and Messrs. Huddart, Parker, and Co.,
the owners of the _Alert_, also, on the 4th January, 1894—six days
after the date of the wreck—sent a cablegram to London, stating that
Ponting was drowned.
The following extract from a letter, lately received at Melbourne by
Mr. Robert Ponting from his brother-in-law, Mr. Thomas Hutton, in
London, clearly gives the particulars of this unaccountable blunder:—
“Dear brother Bob,—
We heartily congratulate you on your wonderful escape from the
sad fate that befel your shipmates through the foundering of the
_Alert_. You also have our sincere sympathy for the terrible ordeal
and physical suffering you have passed through. At the same time I
may tell you that all your relations here had five weeks’ mental
suffering on your account. It came about thus—On Saturday, 30th
December, 1893, I read in the “London Morning Post” a telegraphic
report of the loss of the _Alert_, in which it stated there was
only one survivor, but no name was given. Of course we all hoped
that you were the survivor, and in order to ascertain this I
went, on the 2nd of January, as soon as the office opened after
the holidays, to Mr. James Huddart’s office, 22 Billiter street,
London, but they could give me no information. They told me they
would bring my request for information before Mr. Huddart, and that
evening I got a letter from him stating that he would be glad to
cable to his Melbourne branch if I wished, at my expense. I sent
him, as desired, a cheque for £1 18s 8d, or 4s 10d per word for
eight words—five words for the message and three for the answer.
He deeply deplored the sad necessity there was for such a cable,
but stated that he would send it on at once, and immediately
communicate the result to me. Mr. Huddart got the reply from his
Melbourne office on the 4th January, and then he forwarded a
telegram to me as follows:— ‘Much regret to inform you, brother
(R. Ponting) drowned in the _Alert_.’ Of course I had the sad
duty of letting mother and father and all the other members of
the family know the mournful news that had reached me. You, dear
Bob, can imagine our feelings when we thus knew for certain that
you were lost. We all purchased mourning clothes and wore them
for five weeks, until, on 6th February last, we received a letter
from Mr. James Huddart which filled us all with joy. This letter
enclosed a cutting from a Geelong paper, stating that you had been
saved and that you were the sole survivor. Mr. Huddart’s welcome
communication also stated that owing to a strange error, on the
part of his Melbourne branch, the word “drowned” had been cabled
instead of “saved.” In reply I thanked Mr. Huddart for his kindness
in sending the good news to us, but I did not further refer to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account