Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
WILLIAM KING, examined by Mr. Purves, stated: I am chief engineer
of the _Excelsior_. I am an engineer by profession, and have had
sixteen years’ experience of shipping. I knew the _Alert_, and was
chief engineer of her from 1890 to 1893 in the Bay trade, and also
for six months after the engines were altered. During that time I
went outside the Heads to Tasmania. On that voyage I considered she
was perfectly sea-worthy. We had fine weather going, and very rough
weather coming back. I was perfectly satisfied with the way she
behaved. I never heard of, or saw, any water coming in through bunker
holes or gratings while I was in her. I would go to sea in her any
time and anywhere.
Cross-examined by Mr. Box: Engineers and seamen have to take a good
deal of risk sometimes. If one is out of employment it is not easy
to get a billet. There was no risk in going in the _Alert_. We were
sixteen hours coming from Tasmania. That was the only time I went
outside in her. The _Excelsior_ is larger than the _Alert_. I have
seen the latter shipping heavy water in the Bay. She had to go slow
at times. The new engines lifted her about six inches higher in the
stern.
JOHN LEGG, examined by Mr. Purves, stated: I am dockmaster in the
employ of Mr. Duke, of Duke’s dock. By trade I am a shipwright, and
have been employed by Mr. Duke for about thirty years. I have had the
_Alert_ in dock on many occasions. She was buoyant and able, in my
opinion, for her size.
Cross-examined by Mr. Box: I have never designed a vessel myself. I
have been to sea as master of sailing-vessels, not steamers. I don’t
know anything about the _Alert’s_ inside. She was not very deep, and
was rather narrow in the beam. I would not call her a very tender
vessel. I was on board of her before she was altered, but not after.
I would call her a stable vessel for her size. There is no doubt
that she was fitted for the Bay trade. As to going outside that all
depends upon the weather. It would be a risky thing taking a vessel
built from that model outside in all sorts of weather. I would go to
sea in the _Alert_ in ordinary weather.
JAMES TRAINOR, examined by Mr. Purves, stated: I am a seaman, but at
present I am a labourer. I was an A.B. on board the _Alert_ and other
ships for sixteen years. I went to Tasmania in the _Alert_. She went
without cargo and came back with seventy tons of oats. She behaved
like any other vessel of her size would do. I considered her as good
as any other vessel.
Cross-examined by Mr. Box: I have been wrecked twice. It was my idea
to go in the _Alert_ to see how she would behave. I asked to go. I
volunteered to go in her. I was Huddart, Parker’s man then.
_Q._—I suppose there was great excitement in the office to see how
she would go? _A._—Yes. (Laughter.) I had heard great talk of the
_Alert_. I was not astonished to get back safely in her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account