Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
History
Battling with waves and lawyers : $b a genuine history of perils of the deep and an authentic record of the most important shipping case ever dealt with in the supreme courts of Australasia
Alert (Ship : 1877-1893); Liability for marine accidents; Navigation -- Australia -- History; Shipwrecks -- Australia -- Victoria
RICHARD GOUGH, examined by Mr. Mitchell, stated: I am a shipwright
surveyor, and have been working for about three years surveying
ships for the Marine Board. I knew the _Alert_, and on two occasions
made a survey of her for the river and Bay trade. The last survey I
made was in April, 1893. I then made a declaration. I should say the
_Alert_ was sea-worthy in every respect. The opening spoken of as
the pantry window was about fourteen inches by twelve inches square.
The glass was about half-an-inch thick, and was in a strong wooden
frame. I don’t remember how it was fastened. It would not make the
ship unsea-worthy in the slightest degree. The grating was a great
height from the main deck, and if any water went down it would only
be a splash. The bunker lids fitted into sockets. They rested by
their own weight. Unless the ship were upside down no water could go
through them. In my opinion the wooden awning did not make the ship
unsea-worthy. When the alterations were being made I did not have
before me the specification of what had to be done.
Cross-examined by Mr. Box: On one occasion after repairs were
completed the _Alert_ had a permit to go to Tasmania, not a
certificate. A certificate is for a year; a permit is only for the
occasion. I gave a certificate to the engineer. There would be no
examination of the vessel again on her return from Tasmania because
she had a certificate for the river and Bay trade. We do not make a
declaration to give a permit. I did not make a declaration that the
_Alert_ was fit for the outside trade. Captain Deary was appointed
shipwright surveyor, and he took my place. Captain Deary is not
a shipwright, but I cannot help that. He was appointed, and is a
shipwright surveyor by virtue of his office. A shipwright surveyor’s
certificate should be given by a man skilled in shipwright surveying.
I never measured the grating. When I surveyed the _Alert_ for the
permit to go outside the Heads to Tasmania, she had not got a shutter
in front of the window. I do not remember whether she had a shutter
at any time I surveyed her. I signed a certificate about life-boats
only for the river and Bay trade. I signed only the permit to go
outside. The _Alert_ was built for shallow water.
Re-examined by Mr. Mitchell: In my opinion the _Alert_ was a
sea-worthy vessel fit to go to Tasmania. When Captain Deary made the
declaration that she was fit for the outside trade, I was still a
shipwright surveyor, but was receiving no pay from the Marine Board.
I had ceased to be their officer through retrenchment. I believe the
_Alert’s_ trip to Tasmania had something to do with clearing the
Customs duty off her engines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account