Before the Most Holy = $b (Coram Sanctissimo)Mary Loyola, Mother
Religion
Before the Most Holy = $b (Coram Sanctissimo)
Mary Loyola, Mother
Lord's Supper -- Prayers and devotions -- English; Meditations
CORAM SANCTISSIMO
BEFORE THE MOST HOLY
(CORAM SANCTISSIMO)
BY
MOTHER MARY LOYOLA
OF THE BAR CONVENT, YORK
EDITED BY
FATHER THURSTON, S.J.
ST. LOUIS, MO.
B. HERDER
17 SOUTH BROADWAY
LONDON: SANDS & CO.
1904
Nihil obstat.
HERBERT THURSTON, S.J.,
_Censor Deputatus_.
Imprimatur.
HERBERTUS CARD. VAUGHAN,
_Archiep. Westmonast._
_15th September, 1900._
TO
JESUS CHRIST
YESTERDAY
TO-DAY
AND THE SAME
FOR EVER
PREFACE.
The custom of honouring the Eucharistic presence of Christ our Lord by
paying “Visits” to the Blessed Sacrament may be quoted as one of the
most conspicuous examples of development in the devotional practice
of the Catholic Church. Down to the latter part of the Middle Ages
such an usage seems to have been entirely unknown. As far as regards
England, the late Father Bridgett, if I mistake not, says that in
all the researches made by him while compiling his _History of the
Holy Eucharist in Great Britain_ he had not come across one clear
example of a visit to the Blessed Sacrament in pre-Reformation times.
Even on the Continent the idea of any extra-liturgical _cultus_
of the Blessed Eucharist seems to have grown up very tardily. There
were many saints as late as the fifteenth century, say, for example,
St. Frances of Rome, whose lives show no trace of such a conception,
though nothing could be more strongly emphasised than their devotion
to the Blessed Sacrament in Holy Communion.[1] It is remarkable to
notice that even St. Ignatius Loyola, in the book of the _Spiritual
Exercises_, when directing attention to the abiding presence of God
with His creatures as a motive for awakening love, says not a word of
the Blessed Sacrament. One must not, of course, press the negative
argument too far. No prudent man would infer in this latter case that
the practice of visiting churches to commune with our Lord in the
Tabernacle was unknown in the sixteenth century, but it is reasonable
to conclude that the uninterrupted Eucharistic presence of God with His
people did not then play the same conspicuous part in the devotional
life of the faithful that it does in our day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account