What was now to be done with the palace! Could the people who had so
recently conferred it on him wrest it back? Had the Prince of Orange
been King, the case would have been different, but he was still no more
than a private gentleman, during the life time of his father. He was
not personally responsible for any political offences charged against
the crown, and the confiscation of his property would, therefore, have
been an act of private wrong. Still there was not wanting a party among
the _esprits forts_ of the Revolution, to urge its appropriation to
the purposes of the state. On the other hand, the Prince naturally
indignant at the expulsion of his family, hesitated to take any steps
for the removal of his property, and the entire of the gorgeous
furniture, both of this palace and another at Treveuren on the borders
of the Forest of Soignies, given to him under the same circumstances,
and at the same time, by the nation, were left behind untouched, but
by no means abandoned, as they were still under the charge of his
domestics and agents.
Perhaps, too, in addition to the national unwillingness of the Prince
by the breaking up of his establishment, to avow his consciousness
of the utter hopelessness of the family ever retrieving their lost
position; he may have felt that his deserted palace, with all its
portraits, statues, busts and paintings, its sumptuous decorations
and elegant and refined bijouterie, left as he had last used them,
apparently, in all the hurry and alarm of flight, would be a desirable
memento to leave behind him to the party who still sighed for the
restoration of his house. And that on this consideration, he was in no
haste to make any new disposition of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account