Bell's Cathedrals: A Short Account of Romsey Abbey: A Description of the Fabric and Notes on the History of the Convent of SS. Mary & Ethelfleda — John Shaqi
Bell's Cathedrals: A Short Account of Romsey Abbey: A Description of the Fabric and Notes on the History of the Convent of SS. Mary & EthelfledaPerkins, Thomas, Rev.
History
Bell's Cathedrals: A Short Account of Romsey Abbey: A Description of the Fabric and Notes on the History of the Convent of SS. Mary & Ethelfleda
Perkins, Thomas, Rev.
Romsey Abbey
should carefully study the illustrations in which the triforium appears.
On the east side of the north arm of the transept a more elaborate
arrangement of one of the arches may be seen. Here there are three,
instead of two, subsidiary arches, which are interlaced, but here, also,
the shaft above them appears, though necessarily much reduced in height.
These shafts do not add to the beauty of the triforium, and they hardly
seem necessary to give support to the outer arch (see illustrations, pp.
44, 45).
[Illustration: THE INTERIOR FROM THE WEST]
[Illustration: BASE OF A PIER IN THE NAVE]
The arch at the east end of the triforium on the south side, which
opens out to the transept, is worthy of special notice. Under the outer
round-headed arch is a solid tympanum, beneath which are two very narrow
round-headed arches, separated by a huge cylindrical shaft which has as
its base a large plain rectangular block of stone.
The two eastern bays of the nave on both sides are peculiar. Between them
runs up a solid cylindrical pier, which has its capital at the level of
the spring of the main arches of the triforium. The arches of the main
arcade spring from corbels on the sides of these great pillars, so that it
seems as if the triforium gallery were hanging beneath the arches which
spring below the clerestory. A somewhat similar arrangement may be seen at
the cathedral church of Christ Church at Oxford; some authorities have
from this similarity asserted that the buildings must have been
contemporaneous, but this does not seem to have been the case. Mr. Prior
considers the Romsey work forty years earlier than that at Oxford, dating
it about 1120 against the Oxford work, to which he assigns the date of
about 1160. It may be noticed that the Romsey builder did not continue
this arrangement throughout the nave and choir, whereas this was done at
Oxford.
[Illustration: ARCADING IN THE TOWER ABOVE THE MAIN ARCHES]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account