Benjamin Franklin; Self-Revealed, Volume 2 (of 2): A Biographical and Critical Study Based Mainly on his own WritingsBruce, Wiliam Cabell
History
Benjamin Franklin; Self-Revealed, Volume 2 (of 2): A Biographical and Critical Study Based Mainly on his own Writings
Bruce, Wiliam Cabell
Franklin, Benjamin, 1706-1790
exclaimed, upon being told by his mate, that there was nothing more to
employ them about, "_Oh, make them scour the anchor._" His
absent-mindedness, when electrocuting a turkey, in setting up an electric
circuit through his own body, which cost him the loss of his consciousness,
and a numbness in his arms and the back of his neck, which did not wear off
until the next morning, put him in mind of the blunderer who, "being about
to steal powder, made a hole in the cask with a hot iron." At times, there
was a subjective quality about his stories which lifted them above the
level of mere jests. When the suggestion was made that, in view of the
favor conferred upon America by the repeal of the Stamp Act by Parliament,
America could not, with any face of decency, refuse to defray the expense
incurred by Great Britain in stamping so much paper and parchment, Franklin
did not lack an apposite story in which a hot iron was again made to
figure.
The whole Proceeding [he said] would put one in Mind of
the Frenchman that used to accost English and other
Strangers on the Pont-Neuf, with many Compliments, and
a red hot Iron in his Hand; _Pray Monsieur Anglois_,
says he, _Do me the Favour to let me have the Honour of
thrusting this hot Iron into your Backside?_ Zoons,
what does the Fellow mean! Begone with your Iron or
I'll break your Head! _Nay Monsieur_, replies he, _if
you do not chuse it, I do not insist upon it. But at
least, you will in Justice have the Goodness to pay me
something for the heating of my Iron._
This story was too good not to have a sequel.
As you observe [he wrote to his sister Jane] there was
no swearing in the story of the poker, when I told it.
The late new dresser of it was, probably, the same, or
perhaps akin to him, who, in relating a dispute that
happened between Queen Anne and the Archbishop of
Canterbury, concerning a vacant mitre, which the Queen
was for bestowing on a person the Archbishop thought
unworthy, made both the Queen and the Archbishop swear
three or four thumping oaths in every sentence of the
discussion, and the Archbishop at last gained his
point. One present at this tale, being surprised, said,
"But did the Queen and the Archbishop swear so at one
another?" "O no, no," says the relator; "that is only
_my way_ of telling the story."
Another rather elaborate story was prompted by Franklin's disapproval of
the Society of the Cincinnati.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account