Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ. — John Shaqi
Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.Plutarch
Religion
Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.
Plutarch
Ethics -- Greece; Ethics -- History; Stoics
For those who sail this sea so stormy, so exposed to every tempest,
there is no harbor except death.
He now enjoys a serene and cloudless heaven. From this humble and low
abode, he has sped swiftly into that region, wherever it may be, where
souls, freed from their chains, are received into the abode of the
blest. He now roams about at will, and beholds with supremest delight
all that is good in the universe.... He has not left us; he has gone
before.
DE PROVIDENTIA SIVE QUARE ALIQUA INCOMMODA BONIS VIRIS ACCIDANTCUM
PROVIDENTIA SIT.
NOTE:—This monograph is addressed to the same Lucilius, procurator
of Sicily, to whom Seneca also dedicates his letters and his
Problems in Physics. The date of composition is not known, but it
probably belongs to the later years of the author’s life. The
opening sentences seem to make it a part of a larger work on ethics,
or rather of a theodicy, which was either never completed or has not
come down to us. This is a serious loss both to us and to Seneca: to
us, because such a work would doubtless have placed before us a
complete theory of human conduct as conceived by a man who was
thoroughly conversant with the motives that dominate men; to Seneca,
because it would in all probability have explained if not justified
some of the inconsistencies that have so sadly marred his career.
Indeed the fundamental proposition of the essay is inconsistent,
since the conclusion does not follow from the premises. For if the
patient endurance of tribulation is the supreme test of a good man,
how is he justified in avoiding that test, as our author proposes,
by taking his own life?
I.
You have asked me, Lucilius, why it is, if the world is governed by a
Providence, that so many misfortunes befall good men. To this an answer
would more properly be given in a work in which I should undertake to
prove that a Providence presides over the affairs of men, and that God
dwells among us. But since you deem it best to take a small portion of
the whole subject, and to settle this single disputed question, the main
proposition meanwhile being left untouched, I shall undertake a case of
little difficulty: I shall plead the cause of the gods.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account