Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.Plutarch
Religion
Between Heathenism and Christianity: Being a translation of Seneca's De Providentia, and Plutarch's De sera numinis vindicta, together with notes, additional extracts from these writers and two essays on Graeco-Roman life in the first century after Christ.
Plutarch
Ethics -- Greece; Ethics -- History; Stoics
As a patriotic citizen and an admirer of all that was venerable and
worthy of preservation in the history no less than in the traditions of
Greece, Plutarch felt it incumbent upon him to discharge both civil and
religious duties as occasion called him. He was a priest of Apollo to
whose worship he was ardently devoted and to whom he frequently refers
in his works, among others in the De Sera. As a consequence he
interested himself greatly in the religious festivals that occurred so
frequently in Delphi near by. It is also plain from his writings that he
kept open house. People who desired to learn, and all who took life
seriously, were always welcome. In some of the young men who came to him
for enlightenment, whom, nevertheless, we cannot regard as his pupils
except in the Socratic sense, he took a lifelong interest. The choice of
many of the subjects discussed in his lectures was probably accidental.
They were proposed by persons who visited him, talked over at the time,
but afterwards more fully investigated and the results written out. It
this way light was thrown upon them both by the oral contributions of an
intelligent company and also by the aid of books, of which he had a
large collection.[3]
Plutarch was a man who strove not only to make others wiser, but also to
become wiser himself. His aim was to be a living exemplar of the
doctrines he professed and taught. He was a firm believer in plain
living and high thinking. He disliked as strongly as he disliked
anything the costly and luxurious banquets so much affected by the rich
Romans of his day. The little company that so frequently came together
under his hospitable roof met, not to eat and drink, but to engage in
serious and profitable conversation. The viands were plain—a secondary
matter; the chief thing was the discussion. This often turned on the
most trivial subjects, for the host seems to have thought with Terence:
“Homo sum, et nihil humani a me alienum puto.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account