The first case of such a check on the pleasure-principle is perfectly
familiar to us in the regularity of its occurrence. We know that the
pleasure-principle is adjusted to a primary mode of operation on the
part of the psychic apparatus, and that for the preservation of the
organism amid the difficulties of the external world it is ab initio
useless and indeed extremely dangerous. Under the influence of the
instinct of the ego for self-preservation it is replaced by the
‘reality-principle’, which without giving up the intention of ultimately
attaining pleasure yet demands and enforces the postponement of
satisfaction, the renunciation of manifold possibilities of it, and the
temporary endurance of ‘pain’ on the long and circuitous road to
pleasure. The pleasure-principle however remains for a long time the
method of operation of the sex-impulses, which are not so easily
educable, and it happens over and over again that whether acting through
these impulses or operating in the ego itself it prevails over the
reality-principle to the detriment of the whole organism.
It is at the same time indubitable that the replacement of the
pleasure-principle by the reality-principle can account only for a small
part, and that not the most intense, of painful experiences. Another and
no less regular source of ‘pain’ proceeds from the conflicts and
dissociations in the psychic apparatus during the development of the ego
towards a more highly co-ordinated organisation. Nearly all the energy
with which the apparatus is charged comes from the inborn instincts, but
not all of these are allowed to develop to the same stage. On the way it
over and again happens that particular instincts, or portions of them,
prove irreconcilable in their aims or demands with others which can be
welded into the comprehensive unity of the ego. They are thereupon split
off from this unity by the process of repression, retained on lower
stages of psychic development, and for the time being cut off from all
possibility of gratification. If they then succeed, as so easily happens
with the repressed sex-impulses, in fighting their way through—along
circuitous routes—to a direct or a substitutive gratification, this
success, which might otherwise have brought pleasure, is experienced by
the ego as ‘pain’. In consequence of the old conflict which ended in
repression the pleasure-principle has been violated anew, just at the
moment when certain impulses were at work on the achievement of fresh
pleasure in pursuance of the principle. The details of the process by
which repression changes a possibility of pleasure into a source of
‘pain’ are not yet fully understood, or are not yet capable of clear
presentation, but it is certain that all neurotic ‘pain’ is of this
kind, is pleasure which cannot be experienced as such.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account