Bible Myths and their Parallels in other Religions: Being a Comparison of the Old and New Testament Myths and Miracles with those of the Heathen Nations of Antiquity Considering also their Origin and MeaningDoane, T. W. (Thomas William)
Religion
Bible Myths and their Parallels in other Religions: Being a Comparison of the Old and New Testament Myths and Miracles with those of the Heathen Nations of Antiquity Considering also their Origin and Meaning
[129:1] Eusebius: Eccl. Hist., lib. 2, ch. xiii.
[129:2] Ibid. ch. xiii.
[129:3] See Mallet's Northern Antiquities.
[129:4] See Higgins: Anacalypsis, vol. ii. p. 32, Kingsborough: Mexican
Antiquities, vol. vi. 166 and 175-6.
[129:5] Ibid.
[129:6] See Kingsborough: Mexican Antiquities, vol. vi. p. 176.
[129:7] Ibid. p. 175.
[130:1] See Kingsborough: Mexican Antiquities, vol. vi. p. 176.
[130:2] Ibid. p. 166.
[130:3] Brinton: Myths of the New World, pp. 180, 181.
[130:4] Squire: Serpent Symbol, p. 187.
[130:5] Ibid. p. 188.
[130:6] Ibid.
[130:7] Ibid.
[130:8] Ibid. p. 190.
[131:1] Squire: Serpent Symbol, p. 191.
[131:2] Ibid.
[131:3] Ibid.
[131:4] Ibid. p. 192.
[131:5] "If we seek, in the first three Gospels, to know what his
biographers thought of Jesus, we find his _true humanity_ plainly
stated, and if we possessed only the Gospel of _Mark_ and the discourses
of the Apostles in the _Acts_, the whole Christology of the New
Testament would be reduced to this: that Jesus of Nazareth was '_a
prophet mighty in deeds and in words_, made by God Christ and Lord.'"
(Albert Réville.)
[132:1] Mark, xiii. 32.
[132:2] Mark, x. 40.
[132:3] Mark, x. 18.
[132:4] Mark, xiv. 36.
[132:5] Mark, xv. 34.
[133:1] Matt. and Luke.
"The passages which appear most confirmatory of Christ's Deity, or
Divine nature, are, in the first place, the narratives of the
Incarnation and of the Miraculous Conception, as given by Matthew and
Luke. Now, the two narratives do not harmonize with each other; they
neutralize and negative the _genealogies_ on which depend so large a
portion of the proof of Jesus being the Messiah--the marvellous
statement they contain is not referred to in any subsequent portion of
the two Gospels, and is tacitly but positively negatived by several
passages--it is never mentioned in the Acts or in the Epistles, and was
evidently unknown to all the Apostles--and, finally, the tone of the
narrative, especially in Luke, is poetical and legendary, and bears a
marked similarity to the stories contained in the Apocryphal Gospels."
(W. R. Greg: The Creed of Christendom, p. 229.)
[133:2] Luke, ii. 27.
[133:3] Luke, ii. 41-48.
[133:4] Matt. xiii. 55.
[133:5] Luke, iv. 22. John, i. 46; vi. 42. Luke, iii. 23.
[133:6] Luke, ii. 50.
[133:7] Matt. xiii. 57. Mark, vi. 4.
[133:8] Matt. xii. 48-50. Mark, iii. 33-35.
[133:9] Mark, iii. 21.
[133:10] Dr. Hooykaas.
[133:11] Acts, i. 14.
[133:12] Acts, xxi. 18. Gal. ii. 19-21.
[134:1] See The Bible for Learners, vol. iii. p. 57.
[134:2] Eusebius: Eccl. Hist., lib. 3, ch. xxiv.
[134:3] Mr. George Reber has thoroughly investigated this subject in his
"Christ of Paul," to which the reader is referred.
[134:4] See Gibbon's Rome, vol. i. pp. 515-517.
[135:1] Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv. pp. 488, 489.
[135:2] See Lardner's Works, vol. viii. pp. 395, 396.
[135:3] Ibid. p. 306.
[135:4] Ibid. p. 571.
[136:1] Eusebius: Eccl. Hist., lib. 5, ch. xxv.
[136:2] Lardner: vol. viii. p. 404.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account