Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
Lemonnier discovered that electricity is ever present in the
atmosphere, that it daily increases in quantity from sunrise till about
three or four o’clock in the afternoon, diminishing till the fall of
dew, when it once more increases for a while, and finally diminishes
again before midnight, when it becomes insensible. He observed a
continual diminution of electricity as the rain began to fall, and he
says: “When the wire was surrounded with drops of rain, it was observed
that only some of them were electrical, which was remarkable by the
conic figure they had; whilst the others remained round as before.
It was also perceived that the electrical and non-electrical drops
succeeded almost alternately; this made us call to mind a very singular
phenomenon which happened some years before, to five peasants who were
passing through a cornfield, near Frankfort upon the Oder, during a
thunderstorm; when the lightning killed the first the third and the
fifth of them, without injuring the second or the fourth” (_Phil.
Trans._, Vol. XLVII. p. 550).
REFERENCES.--Le Monnier, “Lois du Magnétisme,” Paris, 1776–1778;
_Phil. Trans._, Vol. XLIV. p. 247; Vol. XLVIII. part i. p.
203; “Journal des Sçavans,” Vol. CXII for 1737, p. 73; also
Hutton’s abridgments, Vol. IX. pp. 275, 308, 368, 591 (biogr.);
John Martyn’s abridgments, Vol. X. part ii. pp. 329–348;
“Philosophical Magazine,” Vol. VI. for 1800, p. 181, “Some
Account of the Late P. C. Le Monnier,” 1715–1799; “Mémoires de
l’Institut Nat. des Sc. et des Arts,” Hist. An. IX. p. 101;
_Mémoires de l’Acad. Royale des Sciences_, 1746, pp. 14–24, 447,
671–696; 1752, Tome I. pp. 9–17, Tome II. 233–243, 346–362;
1770, p. 459; Bertholon, “Elec. du Corps Humain,” 1786, Vol.
I. pp. 10–14; Harris, “Frict. Elec.,” p. 239; _Sc. American
Supplement_, for Oct. 5, 1889, No. 718, pp. 11, 471. See also
reports of the experiments of G. B. Beccaria, G. F. Gardini (“De
inflexu,” etc., ss. 50, 51), Andrew Crosse and others at “Bibl.
Britan. Sc. et Arts,” 1814, Vol. LVI. p. 524.
=A.D. 1746.=--Bevis (John), English astronomer and Secretary of
the Royal Society, first suggested to Dr. Watson the external coating
of the Leyden jar with tinfoil or sheet-lead, and was likewise the
first to observe that the force of the charge increases as larger jars
are employed, but not in proportion to the quantity of water they
contain. As water only played the part of a conductor, he rightly
thought that metal would do equally well, and he therefore filled
three jars with leaden shot instead of with water. When the metallic
connection was made it was found that the discharge from three jars was
greater than that from two and the discharge from two much greater than
that from one. This showed that the seat of the electric force is the
surface of the metal and the glass, and proves that the force of the
charge is in proportion to the quantity of coated surface.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account