Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
REFERENCES.--Ronalds’ “Catalogue,” pp. 369–371; Jean Morin,
“Réplique,” Paris, 1749; A. H. Paulian, “Conjectures,” 1868;
“Abrégé des transactions philosophiques,” Vol. X. p. 336;
“Mémoires de mathématique,” etc., pour 1746, p. 22; “Journal des
Sçavans,” Vol. CXVII. for 1739, pp. 111–115, and Vol. CXLII for
1747, pp. 248–265; “Medical Electricity,” by Dr. H. Lewis Jones,
Philad., 1904, p. 2; “Mémoires de l’Acad. Royale des Sciences”
pour 1745, p. 107; 1746, p. 1; 1747, pp. 24, 102, 149, 207;
1748, p. 164; 1749, p. 444; 1753, pp. 429, 475; 1755, p. 293;
1761, p. 244; 1762, pp. 137, 270; 1764, pp. 408–409; 1766, p.
323; “Leçons,” eighth edition, Vol. IV. p. 315; _Phil. Trans._,
Vol. XLV. p. 187; Vol. XLVI. p. 368; Vol. XLVII. p. 553; also
the following abridgments: Hutton, Vol. X. pp. 20, 295, 372–379,
446 (Dr. Birch); Vol. XI. p. 580; John Martyn, Vol. X. part ii.
pp. 277–333, 382 (Folkes), 414. See the experiments of Etienne
François du Tour, “Sur la manière dont la flamme agit sur les
corps electriques,” in a letter addressed by him to Nollet in
1745, and in “Mém. de Mathém. et Phys.,” Vol. II. p. 246, Paris,
1755; also Zantedeschi and Faraday on the “Magnetic Condition of
Flame” (Faraday’s “Exper. Res.,” Vol. III. pp. 490–493).
=A.D. 1746.=--Wilson (Benjamin) (1721–1788), Secretary to the Royal
Society, writes his “Essay toward an explication of the phenomena of
Electricity deduced from the ether of Sir Isaac Newton.” In the chapter
of Priestley’s “History” treating of the Theories of Electricity, he
says: “With some, and particularly Mr. Wilson, the chief agent in all
electrical operations is Sir Isaac Newton’s ether, which is more or
less dense in all bodies in proportion to the smallness of their pores,
except that it is much denser in sulphureous and unctuous bodies. To
this ether are ascribed the principal phenomena of attraction and
repulsion, whereas the light, the smell, and other sensible qualities
of the electric fluid are referred to the grosser particles of bodies,
driven from them by the forcible action of this ether. Many phenomena
in electricity are also attempted to be explained by means of a
subtile medium, at the surface of all bodies, which is the cause of
the refraction and reflection of the rays of light, and also resist
the entrance and exit of this ether. This medium, he says, extends to
a small distance from the body, and is of the same nature with what is
called the electric fluid.[50] On the surface of conductors this medium
is rare and easily admits the passage of the electric fluid, whereas
on the surface of electrics it is dense and resists it. This medium is
rarefied by heat, which converts non-conductors into conductors.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account