Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
At pp. 71 and 88, 1746 edition, and at p. 88, Prop. XI. of the 1752
edition of this same “Essay,” Wilson says that during the year 1746
he discovered a method of giving the shock of the Leyden jar to any
particular part of the body without affecting any other portion; that
he increased the shock from the jar by plunging it into water, thereby
giving it a coating of water on the outside as high as it was filled on
the inside; and that the accumulation of electricity in the Leyden jar
is always in proportion to the thinness of the glass, the surface of
the glass and that of the non-electrics in contact with the inside and
outside thereof.
It was in this same year, 1746, that Wilson first observed the _lateral
shock_ or _return stroke_, which was not, however, explained until
Lord Mahon, third Earl of Stanhope, published his “Principles of
Electricity,” in 1779.
On the 13th of November, 1760, a paper of Mr. Wilson’s was read before
the Royal Society, in which he detailed several of his ingenious
experiments on the _plus_ and _minus_ of electricity, and showed
that these can be produced at pleasure by carefully attending to the
form of bodies, their sudden or gradual removal and the degrees of
electrifying. He had previously noticed that when two electrics are
rubbed together, the body whose substance is hardest and electric power
strongest is always electrified positively and the other negatively.
Rubbing the tourmaline and amber together he produced a _plus_
electricity on both sides of the stone and a _minus_ on the amber; but,
rubbing the diamond and the tourmaline, both sides of the tourmaline
were electrified _minus_ and the diamond _plus_. When insulated silver
and glass were rubbed, the silver became _minus_ and the glass _plus_.
He further observed that when directing a stream of air against a
tourmaline, a pane of glass or a piece of amber, these were electrified
_plus_ on both sides. Prof. Faraday subsequently showed that no
electrical effect is produced in these cases unless the air is either
damp or holds dry powders in suspension, the electricity being
produced by the friction of particles of water in the one case and
by the particles of powder in the other. Sir David Brewster, who thus
mentions the latter fact, likewise singles out two more of Mr. Wilson’s
observations, viz. that when a stick of sealing-wax is broken across or
when a dry, warm piece of wood is rent asunder, one of the separated
surfaces becomes vitreously and the other resinously electrified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account