Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
=A.D. 1749.=--Duhamel (Henri Louis, du Monceau) (1700–1782), member
of the French Royal Academy of Sciences, develops, in conjunction
with M. Antheaulme, the method introduced by Gowin Knight (A.D. 1746)
for making artificial magnets, which latter process was found to be
defective when applied to very large bars. To Le Maire, however, is due
(_Mem. de l’Acad. de Paris_, 1745 and 1750), the notable improvement
which consists in magnetizing at the same time two steel bars of any
shape by placing them parallel to each other and connecting their
extremities, with pieces of soft iron placed at right angles, in order
to form a closed rectangular parallelogram. Two strong magnets, or two
bunches of small magnetic bars, with their similar poles together, are
then applied to the centre of one of the bars to be magnetized and are
drawn away from each other, practically as in Dr. Knight’s method,
while being held at an inclination of about forty-five degrees. The
operation is repeated upon the other bar and continued alternately
until sufficient magnetism is imparted to both, it being borne in mind
that before the treatment is given to the second bar the poles must in
each instance be reversed, _i. e._ the pole which was to the right hand
should be turned to the left. The entire operation is to be repeated
upon the reverse side of both bars.
REFERENCES.--Harris, “Rudim. Magn.,” I. and II. pp. 85 and 86;
P. Larousse, “Dict. Univ.,” Vol. VI. p. 1363; “Biog. Générale,”
Vol. XV. pp. 106–107; Condorcet, “Eloge de Duhamel”; I. M. Des
Essarts, “Siècles littéraires”; Georges Cuvier, “Hist. des Sc.
Naturelles,” Vol. V; Thos. Thomson, “Hist. of the Roy. Soc.,”
London, 1812, p. 45.
=A.D. 1750–1753.=--In M. Arago’s “Historical Eloge of James Watt,”
translated by James P. Muirhead and published in London during the year
1839, it is said, at p. 6, that Watt constructed, at about the period
first mentioned herein, a small electrical (his earliest) machine, the
brilliant sparks from which became a subject of much amusement and
surprise to all the companions of the poor invalid (“James Watt,” by
Andrew Carnegie, New York, 1905).
=A.D. 1750.=--Wargentin (Pierre Guillaume--Perh Vilhelm--) (1717–1783),
Secretary to the Swedish Academy of Sciences and a distinguished
astronomer, addresses, on the 21st of February, a letter to the Royal
Society, of which a copy is to be found in Vol. XLVII. p. 126 of the
_Phil. Trans._ In this he gives his observations of the result produced
on the magnetic needle by the aurora borealis.
We have already seen (under the A.D. 1683 date), that the discovery
of the fact that magnets are affected by the polar lights has been
ascribed to Wargentin, and we have also learned (A.D. 1722) that he
ascertained the diurnal changes of the magnetic needle with more
precision than had been done by George Graham.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account