Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
REFERENCES.--Walker, “Magnetism,” p. 116; _American Journal
Science and Arts_, 1841, Vol. XXX. p. 227; Celsius, A.D. 1740,
and the abridgments of Hutton, Vol. X. p. 165.
=A.D. 1750.=--Michell (John), an eminent English man of science,
Professor at Queens’ College, Cambridge, publishes “A treatise of
Artificial Magnets, in which is shown an easy and expeditious method of
making them superior to the best natural ones.”
The process introduced by this work is known as that of the “double
touch.” This consists in first joining, at about a quarter of an
inch distance, two bundles of strongly magnetized bars, having their
opposite poles together, and in drawing these bars backward and forward
upon and along the entire length of the bars to be magnetized, which
latter have already been laid down end to end and in a straight line.
The operation is to be repeated upon each side of the bars. The central
bars of a series thus acquire at first a higher degree of magnetism
than do the outer ones, but by transposing the latter and treating all
alike the magnetic virtue is evenly distributed. In this process the
external bars act the same part as do the pieces of soft iron employed
in the Duhamel method.
At Chap. VI. p. 20 of the third volume of his “Rudimentary Magnetism,”
Harris thus expresses himself: “Michell advanced the idea that in
all the experiments of Hauksbee, Dr. Brooke Taylor, William Whiston
and Musschenbroek, the force may really be in the inverse duplicate
ratio of the distances, proper allowance being made for the disturbing
changes in the magnetic forces so inseparable from the nature of the
experiment. He is hence led to conclude that the true law of the force
is identical with that of gravity, although he does not set it down as
certain.”
REFERENCES.--Harris, “Rud. Mag.,” I. and II. pp. 94–95; C. R.
Weld, “Hist. Roy. Soc.,” Vol. I. p. 512; _Phil. Trans._, Vol.
LI. pp. 390, 393, and Hutton’s abridgment, Vol. XI. p. 418;
Gaugain’s observations in “Sc. Am. Suppl.,” No. 7, p. 99.
=A.D. 1750.=--Boulanger--not Boullangère--(Nicholas Antoine)
(1722–1759), a well-known French writer, whose extensive studies were
interrupted by his death, in 1759, at the early age of thirty-seven,
gives, in this “Traité de la cause et des phénomènes de l’électricité,”
accounts of many important observations made in the electrical field.
His attention was carefully given to ascertaining the degrees in which
different substances are capable of being excited, and he gives several
lists of such, inferring therefrom that the most transparent and the
most brittle are always the most electric.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account